Slashdot Mirror


Corporate Identity Theft on the Rise

prostoalex writes "As millions of Americans lose their identities to online and offline thieves, a new kind of crime has been cooked up by the criminals who are not bothering with doing pesky credit card charges. They steal entire companies, opening up merchant accounts for existing businesses and running up charges from aforementioned stolen credit card numbers. What's worse, is that the hole the criminals exploit seems to be built into the system. According to Bob Sullivan from MSNBC, "Many of the processing firms interviewed for this article claimed they caught on to the fraud after the transactions had cleared, but before the suspects had withdrawn the money from various checking accounts around the country. One did concede, however, that the scheme has real potential.""

6 of 193 comments (clear)

  1. Fraud != Theft by Theseus192 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I hate it when the mass media call it "identify theft." If someone impersonates me, he's not taking away my identity, he's committing fraud.

    Repeat after me... intangible and intellectual "property" cannot be "stolen." It can only be used in unauthorized ways.

    --
    If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out? - Will Rogers
  2. How to article by raider_red · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does anyone else have a problem with the level of detail in the article? They not only report on the scam, but tell exactly how it was carried off. They've even provided the names of the merchant transaction companies which can be suckered.

    --
    It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
  3. FBI Not Interested? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Never mistake silence for disinterest (or assent, for that matter).

    The FBI could be very interested in the Pakistan and Russian connections. However they are very unlikely to be discussing details of the case with regular civilians.

    Or they could be disinterested.

  4. Re:why bother stealing a companies identity by KatieL · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually, even if you rush off and buy an off the shelf company and a rename (for a hundred quid say). You still can't open a business account.

    *I* own such a company, I use it, it trades, it files tax returns.... and the palaver I have to go through to open accounts and things is bonkers.

    (Instead I have to turn up with massive piles of other documents.)

    Because I don't have a passport. And in Britain, to open a company bank account, all the company officers have to turn up in person and present their passports.

    So suddenly, you've got to get a fake passport as well.

    And, bear in mind, you also have to somehow change the address of the company at companies house -- otherwise the trick of sending the mail to a duff address doesn't work; given the companies registration number it's trivial to find the registered address.

  5. Re:Bring on those people who roll their eyes by infinite9 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Actually, we tried to have fraud alerts placed in all three credit reporting agencies. The problem is that credit reporting agencies are just as bad (if not worse) than the credit card companies themselves. Since the credit card companies are their customers, and not the people they're gathering information on, they won't actually talk to you. To get a fraud alert, you have to send them a request, in writing. One of the agencies did this immediately. Another did so after a lot of harrassment. The third never did put it on. This was after following all the correct procedures. Once the fraud alerts were on, we ran into them exactly one time while applying for instant credit. In this case, it was a home depot card. The people at the store put me on the phone with their credit department. The woman asked, "Do you know why I'm talking to you?" I mentioned the fraud alert and that was it. Here's your card. No other proof was required. I bought a car without a word from the bank who wrote the loan. Fraud alerts are a joke.

    If someone gets your information, you're hosed. There's only one thing you can do. It was modded +5 funny, but another post hit the nail on the head. Burn your credit rating.

    --
    Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
  6. disinterested? by brauwerman · · Score: 3, Interesting
    It's really annoying when a single word no longer means anything, and concise communication becomes impossible.

    http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=disinte re sted


    Usage Note: In traditional usage, disinterested can only mean having no stake in an outcome, as in
    Since the judge stands to profit from the sale of the company, she cannot be considered a disinterested party in the dispute.
    But despite critical disapproval, disinterested has come to be widely used by many educated writers to mean uninterested or having lost interest as in Since she discovered skiing, she is disinterested in her schoolwork.

    Oddly enough, not interested is the oldest sense of the word, going back to the 17th century. This sense became outmoded in the 18th century but underwent a revival in the first quarter of the early 20th. Despite its resuscitation, this usage is widely considered an error.

    In a 1988 survey, 89 percent of the Usage Panel rejected the sentence
    His unwillingness to give five minutes of his time proves that he is disinterested in finding a solution to the problem.
    This is not a significantly different proportion from the 93 percent who disapproved of the same usage in 1980.