Slashdot Mirror


Smart Cars Coming to Canada and U.S.

AgniTheSane writes "Most importantly the Smart Car looks cool. It also gets 60 mpg, is four feet smaller than a Mini Cooper (you can park two in a standard parking spot), the plastic panels are easily swappable and one color all the way through (so you can't scratch the paint), the steel frame makes it safe in an accident, and you can get it with in-dash Bluetooth (and in Europe can read and write email via the car speakers and a microphone). The Smart car is coming to the US soon, and will cost as little as $12,000. You can read about it in Wired or on MSNBC, or you can go straight to ZAP who will be selling them in the US soon, or the smart car website in the UK. "

10 of 605 comments (clear)

  1. Safe in an accident? by jrumney · · Score: 5, Insightful
    the steel frame makes it safe in an accident

    Provided the accident is a frontal collision with a Mercedes Benz sedan, like in the publicity video, with the Mercedes' crumple zone absorbing all the impact.

    1. Re:Safe in an accident? by Omega+Leader-(P12) · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The short wheelbase ensures any side inpact will hit an axel and not intrude into the passenger cabin. Far better than many other vehicles. (Like the king of fatal side impacts the Ford F-150)

    2. Re:Safe in an accident? by killersneakersofdeat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      or, seeing as you live in a city, you could use a bike. no, I'm not trolling. I'm completely serious. I live in New York City, and I ride a bike everywhere. literally, the only car I own is sitting at a train station near my summer home, waiting for me when I go out there. Bikes make more sense than you'd think in the city: with a good bag or rack on your bike, the short distance riding involved makes shopping quicker and less stressful, and remarkably easy. I am not necessarily suggesting going carless, but in a city like boston, which I know is of the more bike-friendly cities out there, riding places when its almost as fast or faster than a car in traffic, can make sense sometime. think the smart taken to its logical extreme.

  2. Re:Heh by macrom · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While meant as a joke, there is too much truth to this statement (the giving up SUVs part, that is). Especially in larger cities that have a widespread suburban sprawl (like Dallas, Houston, LA, Seattle, Atlanta) that makes owning a bigger car easier, if not something of a status symbol. In cities where parking space is a premium or driving to work doesn't regularly involve an hour+ commute, people may jump on these cars, but we Yanks like big cars to cart our big families around in.

    Then again, I figured that only teenage girls would buy the MINI, and I see those things all over the place.

  3. Acceleration by Brian+Kendig · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Zero to sixty in twenty seconds?

    These things are going to need all the crash protection they can get. They're going to get flattened on any highway on-ramp.

  4. On the downside... by mvdwege · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...It is not user-serviceable without a proprietary toolset.

    Jokes about comparing proprietary software to a car with the hood welded shut are very chilling if this car is the beginning of a trend.

    Mart
    --
    "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
  5. Style issues by StateOfTheUnion · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Many of the style issues that I'm reading on /. are the same ones I heard from European comsumers when the SMART car was first released. Too small, too silly, girly looking bright colors. Just not a macho car.

    A few years later I heard things like great mileage, funky distinct design, low price, reliable, and most importantly able to park it in the tiniest of spaces.

    I don't think that the SMART will ever be the cross country driving car of choice, but as a second car in the city for the 2 parent working family I think its a brilliant idea . . . Why drive a 4000 pound SUV to pick up a gallon of milk at the supermarket if you don't have to?

  6. Re:I've been lied to by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 4, Insightful
    there's tons of free parking

    Not actually 'free', but subsidised. Either your employer, your bank, the mall, or your town paid for the land, paid to have it paved, pays to have it maintained and striped routinely. Unless vast expanses of asphalt just appear by magic, someone is paying for it. And that someone is almost always us, either directly or indirectly.

    Money that could go elsewhere.

  7. Re:Heh by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Is the averge american family that large?
    You obviusly didn't watch http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0390521/Supersize Me!

    Here's the trends from the Centers for Disease Control http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/obesity/trend/prev _char.htm

    Currently, more than 44 million Americans are considered obese by BMI index; that is, have a Body Mass Index (Kg/m2) greater than or equal to 30. This reflects an increase of 74 percent since 1991.
    This is over and above those who are just considered overweight.

    Back on-topic, the car weights 1500 pounds. You won't see it hauling 2 300-pounders with a sub-700cc motor. Then again, as gas prices keep doubling, Mr. and Mrs. Lard-belly won't have the $$$ to both stuff their faces AND run their 8mpg SUVs/cattle haulers, so either they or their vehicles are going on a diet, one way or another.

  8. Re:bah - there is no safety argument by radiotalent · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Everything else aside, this vehicle is safer because it's lighter.

    Which is why we hear of so accidents involving Mack Trucks and Yugos that end badly for the over-the-road truck driver.