eWeek Reviews Gnome 2.8 And KDE 3.3
prostoalex writes "eWeek Labs reviewed the latest editions of GNOME and KDE desktop environments, and for all the criteria that eWeek uses for evaluating the software products ranked 'good,' while usability, capability and reliability for both products ranked 'excellent.' The online version is missing the screenshots and ranking tables that the printed version has, but eWeek likes Evolution (for mail), Konqueror (for file management), Samba and Kopete. They dislike GConf (still complex and a hassle to use) on GNOME and KMail on KDE."
I began reading this review, as I don't use either KDE or GNOME, but am occasionally interested in seeing what they are up to (I use pekwm as a WM and no "desktop environment").
Click here to read about pekwm.
I thought perhaps there would be some insights as to what they were up to, or at least some screenshots, but I was disappointed.
Click here to read about screenshots.
So, on the whole, I must give this review a low score.
10 PRINT CHR$(205.5+RND(1)); : GOTO 10