Slashdot Mirror


Gerrymandering Using Census Clustering And GIS

dpplgngr writes "According to this BBC article, Map redrawing angers U.S. Democrats, Republicans in Texas are making use of Census data and mapping software to redraw districts, signficantly altering the election process, and resulting in the lowest overturn of incumbents in history."

8 of 111 comments (clear)

  1. ancient by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Gerrymandering is an old, old game. There's already a solution for it; computer models exist that can generate maps that are fair. But with all the yelling the Democrats are doing right now, they'd never consider adopting a map-based system because then they'd lose the opportunity to gerrymander next time.

    1. Re:ancient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Exactly, this is nothing new at all, and certainly NOT exclusive to any one political party as the article makes it out to be.

    2. Re:ancient by Sevn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm just glad that two wrongs make a right.

      --
      For every annoying gentoo user, are three even more annoying anti-gentoo crybabies. Take Yosh from #Gimp for example.
    3. Re:ancient by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm just glad that two wrongs make a right.

      No, if you read their comments more closely, you'll see that they're not exactly saying "two wrongs make a right". They're saying an actual wrong and a hypothetical wrong make a right. "If your side was in power they'd be doing this too so it's OK."

    4. Re:ancient by zangdesign · · Score: 2, Insightful

      they'd never consider adopting a map-based system

      Not that it would matter if they endorsed such a system, since the Republicans are firmly in control here. It's more than just a little bit worrisome.

      "We're going to keep on building the party [the Texas GOP] until we're hunting Democrats with dogs." -- attributed to Phil Gramm.

      --
      To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
    5. Re:ancient by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Sorry, but there is no apolitical solution.
      Actually there was, but it may be an anachronism because people have become mobile and isolated compared to the days without motorized traffic and a 'dynamic' labor market. There used to be geographical / social / cultural / geological boundaries which could be said to define communities. For example, people along part of a river could be said to be part of the same community. Or a cluster of neighborhood with the same ethnicity. Or groups on either side of a ridge, canyon or mountain could be said to be part of different communities, same for other physical or psychological obstacles like the proverbial rail road tracks or motorway.

      Yes, there were fuzzy edges to these old distributions more like brownian distribution.

      --
      Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  2. Oooh those evil Republicans by elmegil · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Never mind the Democratic Gerrymanders in Georgia that are ridiculous, or any of the other dozens or hundreds of times that both parties have controlled redistricting to their own benefit.

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  3. Re:Gerrymandering limited by increase in House rep by Slime-dogg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If the number of reps increased, we'd have to rename "pork" to "beef" or "elephant." It's a problem when you have too many cooks, because it spoils the pot. An increase in the numbers would decrease the bill-making efficiency.

    Then again, maybe slowing down congress is just what this country needs. We already have too many federal laws.

    --
    You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.