Can Power Point Prejudice Juries?

expriest writes "Recently, Slashdot considered the issue of e-courts which allow electronic filing of documents and court proceedings to be viewed on flat screens. Some commentators, however, are now questioning the effect of more commonplace technology on the courtroom, Power Point." Below, a bit on the reasoning behind their objections to electronic showmanship in the courtroom.

expriest continues "Theoretically, all trials feature two equally zealous advocates who each forcefully advocate for their clients. The idea is that by giving each litigant a powerful and equally persuasive advocate as their attorney, they will cancel each other out and the truth will be left in the shakeup. But what happens when one attorney uses technology to gain an unfair advantage?

Already one court, the Court of Appeals of Washington, held in State v. Robinson that the prosecution should not have been allowed to use Power Point in their closing argument, for fear that the jury would be move convinced by fancy graphics than by actual evidence.

Trial graphics companies are already a boom industry, with businesses like Trial Image making millions off of lawyers struggling to reduce their case to a picture. The question is, how far should this go? Does even simple technology like Power Point reduce trials to a contest of presentation, not a contest of facts and law?"

Comments

Rediculous

[Skalizar]

A slick oration, a slick computer presentation, its all the same thing. Lawyers have been using printed versions of the same thing for years without it coming under question, how is it different just because its displayed electronically? Because they can use animated wipes?

Job add

[Deternal]

Thou must have:
Extensive knowledge in patent and copyright law.
Atleast 3 years of experience in litigation.
Common knowledge of computers.
Have excellent skills in Adobe Photoshop
Have a Microsoft Certified Law Presentations certificate.

Please send applications to:
The SCO Group
355 South 520 West
Suite 100
Lindon, Utah 84042 USA

New product announced by Microsoft

[jsveiga]

Microsoft (MSFT) has announced the the MS Court Room, a complete Law Office suite including contact management, presentation tools, video production, criminal database search, and many other features to make sure your Court Experience will be embraced and extended.

Also included is a new technology called ClippyLaw, which will automatically call "Objection!" for you, and a state-of-the-art Evidence Manipulation/Statement Retouching software based on News Media Player.

Updated templates for Anti-Trust cases can be downloaded from the Microsoft web site.

A ham sandwich can influence juries

[ghostlibrary]

Now, I realize the idea of court being a fair fight against two equally-matched opponents is appealing, but it's never been like that.

A cute quip can favorably influence juries.

A rigged demo can influence juries.

An inexact analogy can influence juries (wookies, anyone?)

A defendent wearing a suit can influence juries.

A comment removed from the record can influence juries.

A slur against someone's past can influence juries.

An exaggerated testimony can influence juries.

A better-speaking lawyer can influence juries.

Whether the jury is hungry or looking to get home early can influence juries.

Expert witnesses can influence juries.

I don't see why PowerPoint or any technology is any different from the hundreds of tools-and-tricks available to trial lawyers. It does seem unfairly singled out.