Science Television: Does Joe Public Care?
AVIDJockey writes "Wired News has an article about a new science television network. As someone who is a fan of TV shows that lack a shiny veneer of stupid, such as those found on UWTV, UCTV and ResearchChannel, I've wondered if hard science or technology programming will ever catch on with the general public. What do you think?"
...from Star Trek.
Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
Thats why Star Trek is so popular. It has nothing based on science, but says that it is, and has good special effects.
"shiny veneer of stupid..."
Then you wouldn't be watching the Presidential debates, would you?
Seriously. Why would it catch on when intelligent people are in a minority on this planet?
I stopped tuning in when it became the Discover Gay Men's Taste in Decoration Channel.
...Beakman's World when Josie left. And yes, physically-speaking, I'm an adult.
"their goal is to produce the C-SPAN ... of science"
Sure-fire recipe for success!
--
Power to the Peaceful
Eh, I'm bigger than he is :)
Every time I hear his psycho dad talking about "size 12s" I look down at my size 13 steel toes and laugh...
"Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
Get thee to a statistics class!
"Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
> Unless this is done in a very entertaining way, it won't get much of a viewership.
How 'bout if they put the silhouettes of a guy and two robots at the bottom of the screen, and had them riff the show as it ran?
Or else have the shows narrated by babes in bikinis, or maybe female sumo wrestlers.
Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
When a science show says "We've figured out how to make a jet engine," I tend to think "Good, then they don't need my help."