Slashdot Mirror


Intel Cancels LCOS Development

kfstark writes "It looks like the sub $2000 42" flat panel TV has been pushed back for a while. Intel has announced they are cancelling their Liquid Crystal on Silicon development. Guess I'll have to pick out a different gift for for the umm... kids." Earlier we reported their plans to delay their launch of the LCOS chips. Sadly, now it would seem they've been scrapped altogether.

10 of 138 comments (clear)

  1. What's up with Intel? by jmcmunn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They cancel their 4Ghz chips...and now LCOS? Are they hurting for money, or did they just make a couple of bad choices lately that has led to them deciding to end R&D on some projects?

    Or is there something really awesome coming out that they are diverting funds to...doubt it.

    1. Re:What's up with Intel? by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 4, Funny

      Intel is rumored to have begun R&D for HCOS, the Hi-COSt replacement for LCOS. Intel's bean-counters say that the screens will retail for an estimated $250,000, and will be much more profitable than the sub-$2000 LCOS screens.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  2. Reality Meet Intel. by tomstdenis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seems like they're falling-through on many of their more recent promisses? That couldn't possibly be to steal thunder from other people...... no way!

    Hey intel, do what many of us said years ago, ditch the P4 crap, admit that it was a mistake and go the normal high IPC route already. K8's are already smoking you at "non-gaming" [re: serious work] tasks and at least as good if not better at the little fps's anyways.

    So take your Pentium-M and advance it already!

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  3. What does this have to do with cheap flat panels? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Samsung predicts that a price for the 42" PDP will drop to $2099 in the next year and to $1000 in 2006.

  4. In other words .... by binaryDigit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "What we've decided is that for the investment that's required and the returns we would get and the timeline to get to those returns, that it doesn't make sense for us to pursue this particular technology," Intel spokesman Bill Calder said.

    Intel initially planned to deliver chips to TV makers in the second half of this year. But in August, the first signs of trouble surfaced, as Intel indefinitely postponed the project, saying the company had decided to improve picture quality before introducing the product.

    So basically they're saying that they thought they could bust into market because their so awesome at making anything made of silicon. They got their first samples done and they sucked compared to their competitors who haven't exactly been sitting around. Then they realized that hey, it's gonna take a lot of money to have something competitive and just how big is the market for $2000 tv's anyway, esp considering how technologically fickle it is at the moment (almost any technology can assert itself during any given generation). Then they figured, why bother.

  5. Back to back product cancelations? by peterdaly · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What up with Intel? Just a few days they announced they don't think they can pull off a 4Ghz chip. Today they announce this?

    This doesn't bode well for Intel's R&D/Engineering leader image. They really don't need things like this at a time where AMD is eating their lunch for the first time ever, or at least starting to take bites.

    I wonder if this is a sign of things to come from Intel.

    -Pete

    1. Re:Back to back product cancelations? by dj245 · · Score: 4, Funny
      What up with Intel? Just a few days they announced they don't think they can pull off a 4Ghz chip. Today they announce this?

      Sure they can make a 4ghz chip. They just can't cool it without using two vacuum clean motors and a bucket of refrigerant R132.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  6. Attention Mr. Slashdot reader by carnivore302 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dear Mr. Slashdot reader,

    First of all let me appologize for asking for your attention in this rude way. And before I continue, let me first humbly introduce myself. I am Youko Grant Youka, daughter of the late Nigerian prime minister Omboukou Grant Youka. It is with great anticipation that I seek contact with you.

    There is technology available called LCOS. My father, the late Omboukou Grant Youka has invested 300 million dollars in a very secret project to develop inexpensive flat panel displays. When my father passed away, in his will it was determined that whatever was left of the 300 million dollar investment would go to me, his only daughter Youko Grant Youka.

    It is with great discomfort that I now must conclude that since the military has gained power in my country I no longer can rely on the enforcers of the law. There is 206 million dollars left of the investment, which I must transfer to a foreign bank account as soon as possible. If you will help me in achieving this I will as a reward for your kindness share half of this amount (103 million dollars) with you. Does this proposal sound attractive to you?

    With most sincere regards,

    Mrs. Youko Grant Youka

    --
    Please login to access my lawn
  7. Someone smart at Intel by samael · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sounds like there's been a shift in priorities at Intel recently. Someone high up's insisted that all projects be analysed to see if they wil actual be profitable and a few are being canned because they aren't worthwhile.

    Almost certainly a good thing - so long as they're still investing heavily in R&D.

  8. Re:Why a TV? by colins · · Score: 4, Informative

    I call Bullshit.

    Typical home theatre projectors have a 2000 to 3000 hour bulb life these days. If we use the low end, 2000 hours, you would have to run it five and a half hours a day to burn out a bulb in a year.

    A quick check on froogle shows a replacement bulb for the popular Infocus 4805 is $395 USD.

    So your cost estimate is double what it should be, and your life estimate is probably half what it should be at best.

    A $400 bulb every two years or so is more realistic, and for that you get a 100"+ screen to watch in the comfoprt of your own home. Sounds like a good deal to me compared to the alternatives.

    See the forums at http://www.avsforum.com/ for all the info your could ever want on this topic.