Slashdot Mirror


Bush Website Blocked Outside N. America

acey72 writes "The BBC News are reporting that George W Bush's re-election website (don't bother if you aren't in the USA) is blocked to people accessing it from outside the USA. Netcraft spotted the change on Monday, and have a report on the matter. Oh well, at least John Kerry's site still works for us outlanders." At least some Canadians can access the Bush campaign site, but Europeans cannot (without going through a U.S. proxy).

28 of 1,797 comments (clear)

  1. Sticking your head in the sand. by FrankieBoy · · Score: -1, Troll

    Nice. Let's censor information for the Greater Good. I'm not a Bush fan but this is not a good thing in my opinion.

  2. Fascism at work by Nuge · · Score: 0, Troll

    What else do you expect from fascists? The current administration are not Republicans, they are neocons! They are the new fascist party of the United States and are working toward global domination. www.newamericancentury.org to find out more.

  3. Die non-americans die! by thedarksyde · · Score: -1, Troll

    That is because GW hates non-americans! He wants to kill them all, and he surely doesn't want them going to his website with his name on it, looking at picutres of him waving and smiling! That's only for Americans! Close the borders! Lock down the internets! Kill Canada! -GO VOTE!

  4. Re:Stupid. by wuice · · Score: -1, Troll

    It's alright, all he needs is his good friend Diebold.

  5. Last straw by mattr · · Score: 0, Troll
    Well that decided it for me (not kidding). I was solidly anti-Bush until I talked (well, one-way listened) to my folks who are Republicans but sick of Bush too. They think Kerry is terrible, that he has never done a single useful thing in his political career, which he built entirely on 4 months of military service, etc. Wow! I didn't hear anything about that from my ordinary Internet and newspaper trawling, and yet this is basically a nice suburb of NYC. Shook me a little have to say it. Made me think maybe you have to be a little nasty and do this sort of thing to get into high office in the U.S. and stay there. Some other unflattering thoughts. Also some other chunks about slanted media which is getting particularly irksome for a lot of people apparently.


    But this? It makes me realize that no matter what the other guy might be, he is neither a demagogue (or not as much so), nor stupid (or at least not as much so), and so my new choice is to find me an absentee ballot for my first overseas ballot (first voting ever actually) and to pick which of the other guys it will be.


    I was entranced by the coldly mathematical yet interesting libertarian candidate (he strikes me as wonderfully fresh and honest, though I am starting to think he may be at least partially insane). Most interesting there was I only know about him from slashdot and a one hour stream (I think it was maybe a torrent) from his interview on I think CNN.


    I guess I have a responsibility to look for sites of other candidates (preferably torrents of interviews so I can get a good idea of what they are like) and try to get some diverging opinions from people so I can make up my mind.

  6. Re:Someone explain to me how this is news by caseydk · · Score: 0, Troll


    Duh.

    Don't you know that the UK, China, France, Cuba, Afghanistan, and every other country in the world should be able to vote for in the POTUS election?

  7. oh my beloved american friends (NO SARCASM HERE) by kwanbis · · Score: 0, Troll

    please, use your brains ... vote kerry ... have you seen the world latelly?

  8. Re:oh my beloved american friends (NO SARCASM HERE by moronikos · · Score: -1, Troll

    You wouldn't happen to be French and/or Al Qaeda would you?

  9. YES! by gfxguy · · Score: -1, Troll

    Vote Kerry. If you have any faith in world leaders like Arafat, Castro, and Zarqawi, then you are compelled to vote Kerry.

    --
    Stupid sexy Flanders.
    1. Re:YES! by zophim · · Score: -1, Troll

      I find it hard to believe people actually support Kerry. Every time I ask self-proclaimed democrats why they support abortion, they say they believe in a womans right to choose, so I ask them if they know what a late term abortion is, and they dont really know, so I explain that its when they induce labor and when the baby peeks his new-born head out, they drill a hole in his skull and suck out his brains and rip his limbs off and put him in a plastic container. They laugh at me, but when they see the solemn look they stop laughing, and tend to agree with me that abortion is wrong.

      Then you have people like John Kerry out there voting against the Lacy Petersen bill, because it might promote the anti-abortion cause.

      Don't even get me started on the Iraq war. John Kerry should be thrown in jail for aiding the enemy.

      --
      ** Those of us with 0 Karma are the ones making sense. ** ** Help stop rampant sensorship of conservative speech **
    2. Re:YES! by cayenne8 · · Score: 0, Troll
      " John Kerry made a pledge to not raise taxes on people making less than $200,000."

      Well, I've been catching bits on the news (I try to watch them all, CNN, Fox, CBS, NBC, ABC...etc)...that seem to cast some doubt on this pledge of JK. This one quote "The $200,000 figure was plucked out of the air, maybe because polls found that most Americans thought that $200,000 was reasonably rich enough to tax," he said. "But there are a lot of dual-income families in high-cost urban areas throughout America, mostly in the [Democrat-leaning] blue states, who believe they are middle class but who will be hit by these higher rates." It is an interesting article...one of many to be found out there. While I'd say I lean conservative on many issues...they are mostly fiscal...and socially (like abortion rights) I'm slighly liberal. I vote for who I think supports my views the best, I don't care which party they are with. I support no party. I don't believe that GB has lied to the US about anything...certainly no proof. While I do think we were justified in going into Iraq for many reasons other than WMD, I don't beleive he lied...I do believe he acted on faulty intelligence and made decisions based on that. Most of the world for years had the same intelligence and believed it. right or wrong...Bush does seem to stick to his guns on issues...and agree or not, you can see what he stands for. Kerry...I don't see this. Right or wrong, I'd wish he'd pick an issue and stick with it. He seemed quite the pro-war candidate...till he started getting beat by Howard Dean...and changed his tune to win the primary's. Trouble is...he's having to stick with that somewhat in the main election...but is still trying to find wiggle room.

      While I don't like the size of the deficit we have...I understand part of it comes from war expenses...and recession. I don't like the fact that GB hasn't seen a spending bill he didn't like. I want more govt. cuts...

      I just have to disagree...I don't think Kerry is a straight up person. I think he will say and do anything based on the audience he is with. If I perceived he was more honest and would express his opinions on issues and stick to them...I'd be more apt to listen to him and possibly vote that way. He does have issues I like, (increased fed stem cell $'s, cut tax cred. for outsourcing)..etc.

      It is still awhile till Nov. 2....but, at this point...I'm still leaning with Bush as the lesser of two evils...and the main tipping point is taxes. I not only want to keep the cuts...I want more. I don't like the wealth redistribution system the tax system is today. And Bush did indicate he not only want to cut taxes...but, to greatly simplifiy the tax code.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  10. Re:You mean these Iraqis? by Surur · · Score: 0, Troll

    I wonder how many American citizens would be better of being "liberated" from Bush? Can we do a survey and get some stats? Maybe we should just intervene and do some "Regime change", especially if Bush wins, as it is then clearly a perverted, rigged election. Maybe a Lee Harvey Oswald will save us. Surur

    --
    Information is the location of things. Computation is moving things around.
  11. Nice by essreenim · · Score: 1, Troll

    Yeah, Too many hackers from outside the U.S. were trying to take that propaganda machine -www.georgewbush.com - down.

  12. Re:Nice by wpiman · · Score: -1, Troll

    It is imperatif that we not let foreigners see the imperial master plan.

  13. Orson Welles, master storyteller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    For those who don't know or remember, in 1938 Orson Welles did a radio broadcast re-creating the novel "War of the Worlds" but as director he decided to perform it as if it were a news broadcast. People all over the nation freaked out thinking it was real. They loaded their guns and wrapped wet towels over their heads to protect them from alien poison gas. They stocked up on food. They loaded up in their cars and headed out. They filled churches and began praying. Miscarriages and early births were reported in hospitals. People freaked out. Deaths were reported but none were confirmed.

    At the beginning of the broadcast, it was announced that it was just a story and that it wasn't real. Most people missed the first announcement. The disclaimer was then repeated 40 minutes into the show but even though everyone heard it, it went ignored and people's minds blocked out the fact that it was all fake. They were so absorbed in fear, so worried about the alien heat ray, and so frightened at the idea that at any moment they could die that their minds refused to acknowledge the fact that it wasn't real. Fear destroys objectivity and it is impossible to think clearly when you are afraid.

    I feel like the last 3 years have been the sequel. We've been put in such a state of fear that we can't hear the truth. We were told that Iraq could strike us with nerve gas or biological weapons. We were told that their rockets could reach us within 45 minutes of launch. We were told that Saddam was responsible for 9/11. We were told that they had "nukular" weapons. The aliens with their heat ray had landed.

    40 minutes into the program we were told by the same people that none of that was true. How many of you heard the announcement? Right after the announcement, the story was resumed and everyone took their parts to continue scaring us with their beautifully written story.

    I still see people with wet towels wrapped around their heads. I still see people constantly praying to God to save us from the aliens and their heat ray. I still see people living life every day like it was all real. I even see people become angry and violent when others try to tell them that none of it was real. I understand why they behave this way though. We've been kept in a perpetual state of fear and this is a critical piece to the performance. If we're not afraid, we won't vote for the director of this great show.

    Yes, we did get attacked by terrorists. Yes the twin towers fell. No, Iraq had absolutely nothing to do with it. Iraq is War of the Worlds all over again with Bush playing the part of Orson Welles. Now we're about to have elections. At the polls I expect to see people with their guns shifty-eyed looking for aliens. I expect to see people with wet towels on their heads waiting for the alien poison gas to hit. I expect to see people vote that still haven't realized that Iraq was just a fabricated tale told to us so realistically that many of us still believe that it was real.

    Orson Welles for president? I think not.

  14. Yes, you are sorry, Bro by Mulletproof · · Score: -1, Troll

    "Seriously... "Blessed are the Peacemakers" ring any bells?"

    No, seriously. You sound like a complete idiot. Name me a "peace maker" in his place. Go on. Kerry? Oooh, had that Vietnam thing happening. Clinton? attacked Iraq first on the very same premise of WMDs. The UN? Sanctioned the first invasion of Iraq and through their decade of inaction, cost 300,000 their lives.

    Terrorism? Proven. Human rights violations? Proven. Banned weapons programs? Proven. The willingness to use WMDs on his own poulace? Proven. WMDs? Well, still working on that, but question: If 300 tones of high explosive can go missing right out from under the UN's nose, why not WMDs? 300 tones isn't exactly something you can load up onto your 4x4 and boogie out, you know? We're talk a concerted effort using tractor trailers and semies. Where's they go?

    Yes, Bush, root of all evil.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:Yes, you are sorry, Bro by metalhed77 · · Score: 1, Troll

      You misunderstand the arguments against the war. While there are many arguments for the removal of saddam, there are too many reasons not to go to war. Our military is overextended and besides there were better targets regardless.

      Lastly, those 300 tons were likely looted after the invasion, don't let the right wing spin fool you. Wait, you're reading drudge, you already have been fooled. Seriously the man's a master of selective facts. The real story is that while the troops didn't see all the explosives they didn't search the vast compound either.

      And if they discovered that there were no explosives there so long ago how come it took so long to report it? Condoleeza rice said she hadn't heard this till 12 days ago. Oh yeah, no one was on the ball during this war. That alone is a disgraceful shame. So, looted before the war or not, incompetence is still there.

      --
      Photos.
  15. more dem agendas.... by buhatkj · · Score: 0, Troll

    Personally I think a google bomb is in order, who's up for it? flip flopper

    --
    sometimes, i wonder if i'm the only conservative on teh intarweb. ah well, back to mah hogs and warmongerin'....
  16. President Bush is not very nice to them 'furreners by dtjohnson · · Score: 0, Troll

    When they arrive on an airplane to visit, he takes them aside and fingerprints them like criminals. In his debate, he suggested that their low-priced prescription medications would 'kill ya.' Now, he is blocking them from reading his website. He needs to get out more. There's an entire world beyond those Texas borders, Mr. President, that we need to get along with. We all share the same little planet, after all.

  17. Re:oh my beloved american friends (NO SARCASM HERE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Do you really think anyone in the US gives a flying fuck what a french person says? Shouldn't you be out collecting more bribes from terrorists instead of posting here?

  18. Re:and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
    Fuck bush. I am truly embarassed to be an american.

    So get the fuck out and move to France, no one here will miss you.

    Unfortunately I don't belive you will move out. You liberal fucks always talk big and never follow through, just like your beloved commie lover Kerry.

  19. Re:At least the .org's still accessible! by Curtman · · Score: 1, Troll

    Have they changed it now? Or am I supposed to be insulted that it works from Canada?

  20. Re:and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    piss off. we don't you. running imperialist lackey! although to be serious for a moment, we really don't. Right now Canadians are claiming to anti-Bush. That's true, but it's only because he's the American flavour of the day. this country is anti-American. We don't want you.

  21. Re:Someone explain to me how this is news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
    bush didn't invent the internet

    And never claimed he did. That was a democrat who made that absurd claim, among a long list of absurd democrat claims.

  22. Re:Dead Letter Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    it should just be called Linux
    no GNU
    RMS sucks my cock

  23. Re:At least the .org's still accessible! by Weirdofreak · · Score: 1, Troll

    Most non-Americans favour Kerry over Bush, or at least the ones who know who Kerry even is - I swear half of us would be anti-Bush even if his opponents were Hitler and Stalin, out of sheer ignorance.

    However, we don't have a say in the US election for good reason - we aren't the US. We aren't concerned with terrorism, because terrorism is mostly affecting the US. All most of us think about it that there's a war going on, very possibly with soldiers from our own country, and it ain't our quarrel. Why should we help take out people who want to bomb America? Why can't America do it themselves?

    Of course, that's exactly the attitude most of us seem to associate with Americans. And that is exactly the reason patriotism blows.

  24. Re:At least the .org's still accessible! by johnnyb · · Score: 0, Troll

    "Have I been living in the same universe as these guys??? All three pillars involve "peace"? What happened to preemptive war, the axis of evil, not caring what the rest of world think, etc. etc."

    Ummm... there was _never_ peace in the axis of evil. The goal is to make it more peaceful.

    Can you think of a time when NK, Iran, or Iraq were peaceful?

    On the other hand, Germany is peaceful do to our and others' interventions in WWII. Japan is likewise peaceful.

  25. It's nice to see that Bush's foreign policy... by raile · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...of alienation extends to his website.