Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

If You Had To Vote Based On Candidates' Web Pages

Posted by timothy on from the you'd-never-vote-at-all dept.

Kookus writes "Which party has the best team of web deployers/developers? Neither main page passes w3c's html validator, but Kerry's has much fewer "errors". These pages do not seem to do well on Bobby either... Both seem to be using Akamai's HTTP Acceleration/Mirror service which appears to be running linux, Granted that it is hard to please everyone; which team is doing the best job?"

3 of 112 comments (clear)

  1. Cheap shot... by orkysoft · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, one of them tells me I'm not authorized to access it...

    --

    I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  2. Bush's site DOES pass the validator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    <HTML><HEAD>
    <TITLE>Access Denied</TITLE>
    </HEAD><BODY>
    <H1>Access Denied</H1>

    You don't have permission to access "http&#58;&#47;&#47;www&#46;georgewbush&#46;com&#4 7;" on this server.<P>
    </BODY>
    </HTML>
  3. Unity achieved! by Otter · · Score: 2, Funny
    Politics (Michael): Two Bush cousins put up a pro-Kerry site!

    Politics (Pudge): Oh, yeah? Well, Kerry repeatedly got Red Sox scores wrong!

    Politics (Timothy): But they both --- serve their campaign sites on Linux!

    Audience: Hugs all around! And if we cared about HTML standards compliance, we wouldn't be reading Slashdot!

    --
    What I'm listening to now on Pandora...