Slashdot Mirror


The Return of the Sun Workstation, With AMD's Help

Hack Jandy writes "Would you be surprised to hear Sun is the lowest cost Tier 1 dual-Opteron provider? AnandTech benchmarks Sun's newest w2100z and includes some sneak peaks at Solaris 10 and Java Desktop System 2. The biggest surprise at the end - it costs less than IBM and HP's configurations. Has Sun learned from the demise of SGI workstations that relying on one processor architecture is harmful?" CrzyP adds "They perform various benchmarks including 2D/3D rendering, compiling, encryption, and thermal and noise performance, and compare the 64-bit Sun box with various other configurations, including varying operating systems."

21 of 235 comments (clear)

  1. some info about Java Desktop by hsmith · · Score: 4, Informative

    Since the article doesn't link it

    http://wwws.sun.com/software/javadesktopsystem/

  2. I dunno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    Has Sun learned from the demise of SGI workstations that relying on one processor architecture is harmful?

    The lesson I'd learn from SGI is that jumping into the WinTel server market is harmful.

  3. As I remember... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 3, Insightful

    SGI started going downhill about the same time they first offered a WinNT machine. But yeh, it's a good thing to homogenize all our processor architectures, because there is only one perfect CPU, and Intel makes it.

    Am I the only one who longs for when we actually had a choice of CPUs?

    1. Re:As I remember... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Insightful
      And x86 isn't bad, in itself... it's bad that it will be one of the few (only?) left. That annoys me. That people think it a good thing, that's plain frightening.

      Can you name one feature (other than endianness or a few percent benchmark edge) that a user or even a C developer would notice that's different between an modern X86 CPU and any other modern CPU?

      X86 is just an instruction bytecode format. The internals of today's X86 CPUs vary almost as much as the internals of CPUs with differring instruction sets.

    2. Re:As I remember... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, most CPUs have converged to a very similar feature set. However, I don't think that you can blame it on the "X86ness" of it. It's just because those are the features that seem to work with today's chip-making technology. It's probably the same reason that all modern jet airliners look almost exactly the same.

  4. What would really be surprising by overshoot · · Score: 4, Interesting
    would be if they actually got their X11 implementation working almost as well as an etch-a-sketch.

    I finally escaped from 7 years on a Sun workstation to a Linux box. Solaris had its advantages, but X11 wasn't one of them and CDE wasn't another.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    1. Re:What would really be surprising by Jahf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The magic of Opteron is that you can be using a Sun workstation, getting low-cost high-performance Opteron CPUs and also be running Linux. I think that was the purpose of the article.

      (written on a Sun w2100z dual Opteron box running Ubuntu AMD64 Linux with VMWare installed).

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    2. Re:What would really be surprising by idiotnot · · Score: 3, Funny

      the beta of sol10 x86 I've been running uses x.org. No problems at all with my Radeon 9k. Accel 2D only.

    3. Re:What would really be surprising by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Solaris had its advantages, but X11 wasn't one of them and CDE wasn't another.

      1) Your Sun workstation had a genuine and complete OpenGL implementation.
      2) Sun provides the configuration for the X server, so you don't have to.
      3) Sun's packages generally update the X server configuration for you, so you don't have to.
      4) XDM for remote logins works out of the box.
      5) Sun's drivers are integration tested with the hardware, so there are few suprises.

      The only detractions I can say about Xsun/CDE are that there are extensions becoming popular in the XFree86/X.org realm that Sun hasn't adopted, yet, and that CDE, while functional, definitely has some flakes. However, I still use CDE, because GNOME still has a long way to go (looking foward to seeing how Solaris 10's GNOME works).

      On the flip side, getting OpenGL working under many PC configurations is a flat out nightmare, and the configurations files are also a nightmare. Linux/X.org are nice, but even a rose has thorns.

      --
      -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
  5. Need modern workstation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Damn! If I only had a MODERN Sun workstation it might just have been fast enough to get first pos!

    On the subject of workstations though... At a train station, trains stop. At a bus stations, buses stop. What does work do at a workstation?

  6. For those who don't want to click through... by GillBates0 · · Score: 3, Informative
    Direct link to the Conclusions page

    The results of the SPEC benchmarks (Page 8) look quite impressive, from a cursory look at the graphs (more=better). It seemed to outperform RH9 and SuSE9.1 on most of them.

    Quite an extensive review IMHO.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  7. Typical by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Everyone in the PC world worries about cost as their main consideration. Well, that's only an issue if you have one system, and you pay for that yourself. Real Computers, individuals don't buy them, and believe it or not, price is occasionally not the first and last consideration.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  8. Here Comes the SUN...again by Eberlin · · Score: 3, Informative

    Are we talking about SUN the hardware company or SUN the Solaris folks? Hey, aren't they the ones that bought out the folks that eventually led to Star Office? Wait, I think they mentioned Java Desktop so is the compile-once-run-anywhere SUN?

    Oh, Java Desktop is Linux with some java-related enhancements? Boy, these guys must really like Linux to be using it. Didn't they buy Cobalt before...and those things used Linux? I'm glad a large company is getting behind Linux in such a big way.

    Wait, now I'm confused...they don't LIKE Linux?

    Anyone know what SUN does for a living? Reminds me of a slacker surfer dude with all these different "money-making" schemes they keep pitching. Diversifying sounds more and more like treading water.

  9. Don't call this a comeback, been here for years by ebooher · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The title is a little interesting to me. The Return of the SUN Workstation. Does this mean to say that the current versions of UltraSPARC and Sun Blade systems shouldn't be considered workstations? What do we (as a /. community) describe workstation as, anyway? Do we mean to say really high end 3D work in CAD/CAM, etc? Is the lowly XP machine I'm forced to use at work a "workstation" because it's where I get work done?

    The new Java Workstation series with the AMD Opteron processor is a pretty neat box. Hit SUN.com and download their PDF's on the machine. One includes a diagram/schematic of the motherboard. The motherboard is the mainboard and daughterboard. The daughterboard happens to house the PCI bus and associated gear as well as the SCSI adapter onboard. I wonder why. Will SUN later introduce a different daughterboard with some other version of expansion upgradability? Maybe with SATA instead of SCSI? Just a way to keep the mainboard more flexible?

    It also needs to be said that this isn't just a dual Opteron machine. There is a single proc version of the motherboard. They are also as full on x86 as you can get. No really out there ROMs or chips that only SUN knows about, because they are rated to run Windows as well.

    So the units will run all x86 OS's without a hitch, they just happen to have some SUN engineering behind them as well as the SUN name. I think the main push for the Opteron was that they have an entry level server built around it. SUN knows that not everybody buys really high end multi $$K machines and that some data centers only need one or two sub $1K servers.

    Is this why SUN is so vocal about their new found friends at Microsoft? Because they knew they would be releasing x86 gear that would be certified for Windows Server products and wanted to make sure the world knew that you didn't have to get your WinBoxes from Dell or HP anymore?

    --
    "Genius may shine aloof and alone, like a star, but goodness is social, and it takes two men and God to make a Brother."
  10. Re:Their Xeon trade-in program is still going on t by Jahf · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually the best way to buy a w2100z, if you don't need it -today- but do want it cheap, is to buy off of Ebay. They are regularly going for about 1/2 the retail price.

    And AMD isn't subsidizing this at all, at least not actively. Sun just happens to be willing to sell for much lower than their traditional margins on these products to get back some of the workstation market. They have realized that workstations were a wedge into the hearts and minds of the admins who later (sometimes years later) made decisions on servers. And Sun has some very well priced Opteron servers now, too.

    --
    It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
  11. w2100z. w00t! by micromoog · · Score: 4, Funny

    Every time I see w2100z, my internal 1337-sp34k decoder kicks on. Then I realize it's the actual product name.

  12. Re:Their Xeon trade-in program is still going on t by Jahf · · Score: 3, Informative

    Must have been awhile back ...

    Sun's Xeon servers (V60x and V65x) came out about 15 months ago. The LX50 (a P3 Xeon based server) came out about a year before that.

    Sun's Opteron servers (V20z and V40z) started showing up about 6 months ago.

    Sun doesn't have any Intel based workstations ... the trade-in programs are generally to encourage people to give up their Xeons from other sources :)

    Sun's Opteron workstations (w1100z and w2100z) started showing up a couple months ago.

    Sun also has a low voltage Xeon Blade and an Athlon XP Blade. Based on trends I wouldn't be surprised to see an Opteron Blade if power requirements allow.

    It is pretty obvious that it was so much x86 that Sun was against as it was Intel. When I was in Sun's entry-level server group the decision to use Xeon's was only grudgingly done because the Opterons kept getting pushed out. With a 64-bit CPU from an Intel competitor it looks like Sun is alot more comfortable with the relationship on the low-end. Opterons currently max out at 8 CPUs (I think) which is about the point where Sun's SPARC starts to really shine, so it has a lot of synergy.

    --
    It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
  13. Cheaper than IBM? So what? by BobaFett · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's not IBM Sun has to compete against with these boxes. It's Dell. Dell sells the 64-bit workstations with Intel's Opteron clones, even with Linux preloaded, and beats Sun by at least 30%. It's even worse if you configure them with more RAM: Sun is so used to charging outrageous prices for their workstation RAM that they just can't turn on a dime. Dell wants about $1200 for the extra 4G of RAM (to bring the total to 8G), Sun at least twice as much.

    It's good that Sun realized that they have to move to commodity hardware if they want to survive, now we're waiting for them to have an epiphany that commodity hardware sells at commodity prices.

  14. Re:Sounds like a good linux platform by ebooher · · Score: 3, Informative

    Nope, no custom firmware. From: http://www.sun.com/desktop/workstation/w2100z/

    The dual-processor Sun Java Workstation W2100z, first in a new line of AMD Opteron processor-based workstations from Sun, delivers ultimate performance, visualization-class graphics solutions, high I/O throughput, and the ability to deploy large data sets (up to 16 GB in size) across multiple operating systems, including the Solaris OS, Linux, and Windows.
    --
    "Genius may shine aloof and alone, like a star, but goodness is social, and it takes two men and God to make a Brother."
  15. Re:but who spends US$8700 on a work station? by ebooher · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well, the tip top of the line is $8700.00, but they start out much cheaper than that.

    w1100z

    Opteron Model 144 (Single)

    1 MB L2 Cache

    Quadro NVS280 Graphics

    512 MB RAM

    80 GB HDD

    GigE

    5 USB, 2 1394, 2 Serial, 1 AGP 8x, 5 PCI-X

    DVD-ROM/CD-RW

    $1,495.00

    Opteron Model 150 (Single)

    1 MB L2 Cache

    Quadro FX500 Graphics

    1 GB RAM

    80 GB HDD

    GigE

    5 USB, 2 1394, 2 Serial, 1 AGP 8x, 5 PCI-X

    DVD-ROM/CD-RW

    $2,095.00

    w2100z

    Opteron Model 246 (Dual)

    1 MB L2 Cache

    Quadro NVS280 Graphics

    2 GB RAM

    73 GB HDD (SCSI)

    GigE

    5 USB, 2 1394, 2 Serial, 1 AGP 8x, 5 PCI-X

    DVD-ROM/CD-RW

    $4,695.00

    Opteron Model 250 (Dual)

    1 MB L2 Cache

    Quadro FX3000 Graphics

    4 GB RAM

    73 GB HDD (SCSI)

    GigE

    5 USB, 2 1394, 2 Serial, 1 AGP 8x, 5 PCI-X

    DVD-ROM/CD-RW

    $8,695.00

    --
    "Genius may shine aloof and alone, like a star, but goodness is social, and it takes two men and God to make a Brother."
  16. A bit of Mac whoring from a price perspective... by ikewillis · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Even in the enterprise and scientific community cost is still a consideration. I come from a scientific computing group that used to pay $20,000 for dual UltraSPARC-III Sun Blade workstations, then moved to Linux clusters, and is now moving to Apple clusters and Apple workstations. After being given a large discount by Apple, we found Apple's offer of cluster of 20 dual 2.0GHz G5 Xserves to be more powerful (and certainly less problematic) than Dell's offer of 20 3.2GHz Nocona Xeons. We found the new Intel Fortran Compiler 8.1 with EM64T support to be rather underwelming... its binaries optimized for the 64-bit Nocona Xeons with SSE3 couldn't outperform those made by Pathscale, the leading AMD64 compiler suite, on Intel's own processors (even though Pathscale only supports SSE2). However, neither could outperform IBM XL Fortran on the Xserve's 2.0GHz IBM PPC970FX processors with AltiVec units.

    At less than an eighth of the price of a Sun workstation, you can purchase a dual 2.5GHz G5, which lacks many of the amenities of Sun Blades such as ECC RAM and 10,000RPM FC-AL hard drives, the model runs considerably faster at a fraction of the price, and the system can double as a user desktop with both Unix (i.e. scientific computing programs) and (otherwise) Windows amenities such as Microsoft Office and Adobe tools (Photoshop/Illustrator/Acrobat).

    For any role I can imagine for a dual Opteron workstation, I can see a G5 in the same role for a considerably cheaper price. Furthermore, I can see a G5 outperforming an Opteron in any of those roles, because in virtually all of them (scientific computing, medical computing, multimedia/3D modelling/video production) the AltiVec unit on the G5 will be extremely beneficial, whereas Opteron has no good vector units for these purposes (Opteron SSE2 is slower than its FPU, SSE is only 64-bits, doesn't support double precision floating point or the multitude of operations AltiVec supports such as trig functions needed for FFT/DCT transforms)

    I believe that next to the new Nocona Xeon-based Dell Precision workstations (with SSE3 which is comparable to AltiVec), Apple has the cheapest and most powerful Tier 1 workstation offering in the form of the dual 2.5GHz G5, at least for the roles a high end dual processor 64-bit workstation is intended to serve.