Slashdot Mirror


Press freedom

GarconDuMonde writes "Reporters San Frontiers has released it's third annual worldwide index of press freedom. Although the majority of top-ranking countries are from northern Europe, it is perhaps more interesting to note where countries such as Switzerland, Italy, the UK and the USA fall (1, 39, 28 and 22, respectively)."

7 of 598 comments (clear)

  1. Isn't Switzerland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The country responsible for getting the Indymedia servers pulled?

  2. Not My Usual "Freedom of the Press" by Jameth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In general, it refers to how much freedom members of the press are given, not to how free speech/publication is. For example, the US is cited for trouble giving press visas, and the arrest of reporters during demonstrations. It makes no mention of any other restrictions on speech, no mention of a climate that is hostile to some forms of the press, no mention of the way that the president grants the media access and chooses questions.

    The study seems to completely ignore non-official members of the press. A few years back, this would have been fine. However, the formality of the press is dispersing. Just look at the blogging community. That's the press. I think it's a useful metric, but definitely not the final statement on the issue.

  3. Re:Americans talk about freedom by kfg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Unamerican Tshirt

    I got the quote a bit wrong, and in this case they were threatened with a charge of disorderly conduct, but in other cases trespass has actually been formally charged.

    KFG

  4. American cliche's redux by theolein · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't fully understand this american hatred of Switzerland, since it mostly seems to fall in one of two categories: The Banks hiding illegal money and Switzerland's neutrality.

    As regards the banks, they are Switzerland's biggest employers and so do get more priviliges than they should, and they definitely did take anyone's money in the past. They don't, however, do this any longer. Saddam Hussein's money has been frozen for years and the Swiss authorities do give information on account holders to judicial enquiries from countries with which Switzerland has legal agreements. That is why criminals prefer to keep their money in the Cayman islands these days.

    But I never hear any such moral preaching against the Cayman Islands.

    Secondly, Switzerland is a tiny country that was surrounded by hostile nations for most of its history. For that reason the Swiss decided to become neutral, as it kept them from having to go through the ravages of the first and second world wars. Switzerland takes its neutrality seriously and doesn't support bullshit wars like the fucking stunt you yanks pulled in Iraq, or the fucking stunt that Saddam pulled in Kuwait.

    Switzerland is by no means perfect, (I live here and don't really like it or the people) but it minds its own business and would like other countries to do the same.

    I think you people who constantly preach about how morally corrupt Switzerland is are just ashamed of all the crap that your own country does.

  5. Re:Americans talk about freedom by Keith+McClary · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "A Saudi-American captured in Afghanistan, labeled an enemy combatant and held in U.S. solitary confinement for nearly three years without charge returned to his family Monday after agreeing to forfeit his U.S. citizenship for freedom."
    http://www.cleveland.com/world/plaindealer/index.s sf?/base/news/1097578544287260.xml
    Detainee forfeits U.S. citizenship for freedom

    Fair trade?

  6. Re:Americans talk about freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting
    canada's for example is very SPECIFIC and has definite wording for their "freedom of speeach"

    Actually, as a Canadian, it was the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms that was foremost in my mind when I posted that.

    Right at the top:

    1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.

    That defines a limit on freedom that does not really exist in the U.S. constitution, and leaves the limit very much open to debate. People who know anything about the Charter (including judges and lawyers) are well aware of this, and eager to push back against government attempts to curtail freedom. We know the government would get away with it if we let them. No false sense of security there.

    In contrast, Americans (with the exception of a few, who are usually marginalized as "$foo-wing nutcases"), seem more willing to sit back and expect the Constitution to protect them. At least, that's my perception, as a non-American.

  7. Re:Press Freedom absolutely necessary by ThaReetLad · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It is obvious that most of the mainstream press has a left wing slant to it.
    But on a global scale, even your left wing is right wing, and your right wing is only slightly left of Mussolini.

    Just because the Democrats pass for lefties in America, it doesn't mean they would anywhere else.
    --
    You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine