Slashdot Mirror


Blunkett Backs Down on UK ID Cards

Anonymous Brave Guy writes "Some people don't like the civil rights concerns. Some think they'll cost too much. Some think they'll lead to more identity theft than identity verification. Some think governments can't manage big database projects and there are bound to be mistakes and over-runs. Any way you look at it, compulsory ID cards have a lot of potential drawbacks, so is the UK's Home Secretary, David Blunkett, starting to back down from the idea? Combining ID cards with passports and driving licenses was the key way to force them on an often unwilling UK population, and seems to have gone for good, but apparently legislation to bring in some form of ID card is still likely in the next Queen's Speech. Is it the beginning of the end of a bad idea, or just more spin to dodge the remaining concerns?"

1 of 374 comments (clear)

  1. Re:This doesn't seem like a new conclusion by aaza · · Score: 4, Funny
    Reminds me of a conversation between Sir Humphrey and Sir Desmond (both of "Yes, Minister")

    Sir Desmond Glazebrook : Surely once a Minister has made his decision, that's it, isn't it?
    Sir Humphrey Appleby : What on earth gave you that idea?
    Sir Desmond Glazebrook : Surely a decision is a decision.
    Sir Humphrey Appleby : Only if it is the decision you want. If not it is just a temporary setback.

    I want to know if this decision is a decision, or a temporary setback.

    quote found on imdb's "Yes, Minister" quotes section

    --
    In theory there is no difference between theory and practice.
    In practice, however, there is.