UK Government Reports Linux is 'Viable'
CProgrammer98 writes "The Beeb is reporting that The UK Office of Government Commerce has published their final results following trials on the use of OSS and especially Linux and they conclude that Linux is a viable option for government use. From their summary: 'The report shows that Open Source software is rapidly maturing, offers significant potential benefits to government and should be actively considered alongside proprietary alternatives. It concludes that decisions should be based on a holistic assessment of future needs, taking into account total cost of ownership, with proper consideration of both proprietary and open source solutions.'"
Her son is a Solaris person.
Omnis amans amens
Windows for warships is scary.
See also Groklaw's coverage of the Ballmer email
The unofficial
I never realised linux had reached a level of maturity that would mean that it is inefficient enough for the gov to even consider using it.
The Nigerian government reports that *BSD is still defunct!
the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
World's Fastest Computer Runs Linux
UK Government Recognizes Independence of American Colonies
Windows Considered Harmful
Stewart Recommends Telling Truth To Investigators
Experts Warn Not To Cross Street Without Looking
- film at 11
sigs, as if you care.
I think I will start using linux now. I am very reassured by this.
The UK govermnent has always been second to none in their execution and understanding of IT projects. They are get things right first time and are consistently under budget and finish early.
I trust nobody more to speak with authority on issues like this.
BWAHAHAHAAA!!!!!
The UK GOVERNMENT!! says LINUX IS VIABLE!!!! HAHAHA!!!!
-- MartinG To mail me: echo kewyjlcxyzvjfxbqwh | tr bcefhjklqvwxyz
In a stunning admission that post Ptolemaic science may in fact be an acceptable realm of study, the Vatican announced today that it is entirely plausible that gravity in fact, exists. This reverses nearly 2000 years of Christian theology which until now had answered such questions with "God says, case closed, now go home and make more Catholics."
The question is: why bother releasing in .DOC when there's an RTF right above it? Hmm..
.DOC file as well, otherwise we wouldn't be getting our money's worth. :)
The RTF doesn't contain the metadata. We can't tell who edited it and for how long, and there won't be any embarassing edits to display in the revision history. Obviously they have to release the
For example, if their websever were using OSS, doubtless I'd be able to RTFA rather than getting 500 internal server error.
No, this is the UK Government If they realise its a bad idea, they vote for it.
Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII