Cool RSS Feeds?
mgessner asks: "I'm searching for some new and interesting things to read related to geekdom, humor, the Internet, and all things technological. Normally, I'd search Google for this, but trying to find something like RSS feeds on Google would be like looking for a needle in a haystack: there's just too much to sift through. So, does anyone want to share their favorite RSS feeds (other than our own beloved /.) they'd like to recommend?"
If you like to keep up with your favorite hackers in the FOSS world:
http://www.planetplanet.org/ has a list of blog aggregators for various projects!
gizmodo and engadget are two blogs that look at all sorts of electronic goodness daily. A lot of times they dupe each other, but mostly not. Reading both of them is far from redundant. And if you read them you start to laugh at how often slashdot gets the same news so much later.
/.
In other words, if you read these two sites, you can turn off the matching topics on
The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/wp-rss2.php
Thomas Warfield about the life of a successful shareware author:
http://www.asharewarelife.com/atom.xml
A Multiplayer Strategy Game for Mac OS X, Windows, and Linux
Just to clarify that these are not the only RSS feeds I offer, but just the most interesting ones that have useful content. I post this message not as an advertisement, but only because I truly believe that these feeds will be interesting to you (and you asked to be informed about interesting feeds).
Note: Please do not read the RSS feeds more than 4-6 times per day because I want to keep the server utilisation low.
How about my site? I wrote a really simple python robot (I called it Lividot) to track almost 100 geekdom, humor, technological sites. You can reach it at: http://livid.3322.org/
If you check out google you can get some pretty good (unofficial) bittorrent rss feeds (*cough* suprnova *cough*).
Also what I find cool are rss feeds of tv listings.
Two other feeds I check out regularly that aren't mentioned here are Packet storm & Tomshardware.
Atom's main goal is to have a well specified unambigious specification. The problem behind RSS is that it is ambigious - so leads to silent data loss - and it took the rather public failure at Reuters for the point to sink in. As such, it is close to impossible for a specification to be both unambigious and backwards compatible with RSS. A clean break results in a cleaner and more implementable specification, especially since we are not loaded with the baggage of previous unreversable mistakes in RSS. Notwithstanding, the "solution" to the Reuters problem now breaks RSS2.0's backward compatibility with RSS0.91.
Even the motivation behind Atom is clear: