Slashdot Mirror


Coating Promises Scratch-Proof CDs, DVDs, LCDs

13.7BillionYears writes "NewScientist reports that TDK has developed a transparent polymer for LCD screens and optical media that is impervious to general neglect and abuse. Quoth the reporter, 'In one of the most convincing technology demonstrations this reporter has witnessed, I was handed a CD, a wire-wool pan scourer and some permanent marker pens, and invited to scratch or mark the discs. Hard as I tried, I could not make a single mark on the disc with the scourer. And the ink simply wiped off.' The coating is apparently responsible for Blu-Ray's new caddy-less form factor."

33 of 542 comments (clear)

  1. For cars too? by fembots · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If this can be applied to cars when coming out of factory, it'll save a lot of 'disagreement' with supermarket trollies.

    There's no mention of price, and more importantly, the ease of removal if this protective coating is somehow scratched. I find the current PDA sheet very difficult to remove (as if you're about to pull the LCD out).

    And will record companies do more to prevent "backup" copies now that you simply can't scratch your CDs anymore??

    1. Re:For cars too? by UWC · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And will record companies do more to prevent "backup" copies now that you simply can't scratch your CDs anymore??

      I imagine the coating won't put up much of a fight to simple breakage of the disc. Though I suppose such occurrences are less frequent than severe scratching, it's still a valid concern for someone who travels with or otherwise moves their media about frequently.

    2. Re:For cars too? by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      to hell with consumer uses.

      why has this not been applied to aircraft? the plastic windows and canopies on aircraft are notorius for being super easy to scratch and always having some kind of scratches in them even when the utmost care is taken with them.

      Hell, a car windshield made out of plastic would be far superior to the glass we have today. It would revolutionize the automotive industry in designs alone! a wrap around "jetsons" type of car would be possible.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:For cars too? by dykofone · · Score: 3, Interesting
      That's where the 50 mph winds come in.

      Like putting on a coat of hydrophobic Rain-X, the water will bead up (as described in the article) instead of sticking to the surface. It's the streaking water being splashed about in the rain that causes the greatest distortion when looking through the windshield. With that hydrophobic layer, the water almost instantly collects into large drops with plenty of space to see between them clearly, which are then pushed off by the wind.

    4. Re:For cars too? by Woody77 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My experience with Rain-X on three different vehicles is that you don't need wipers at anything over 45mph, and below that, it depends on how hard it's raining, and how recently you applied it.

      A fresh coating, in light rain should collect into drops you can see around, and in heavy rain, it will streak down so fast it won't be a problem.

      Misting is the only problem I've had, where it tends to form "microdrops" that aren't large enough and close enough together to clump into a larger drop and fall, but are difficult to see around, but it's not much worse than a problematic defogger.

    5. Re:For cars too? by Curtman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was most impressed by the small scale sparkling and fireworks.

      Surprisingly, grapes are a lot of fun too.

    6. Re:For cars too? by cyberon22 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That works, but why not just put the sticker you write on above the protective layer. Why is this even a question?

    7. Re:For cars too? by evanbd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Lit matches, too. Or a candle, or other flame / plasma source. That seems easier than drying lots of grapes. Btw, if the plasma ball gets stuck, open the door quickly, before the paint starts to burn... that *really* stinks.

    8. Re:For cars too? by Zebbers · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Umm wouldn't windhisled that don't break cause more fatalities? I'd imagine that doing a header through breakable glass is much more desirable than through jaws of life proof brick wall like polycarbonate.

    9. Re:For cars too? by maeka · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Automotive windshields are not tempered glass because they are designed to keep passengers inside the car in case of an accident. Your chances of survival are greatly diminished if you are ejected from the vehicle. It is well known that designing windshields like this increases the skull trauma to an unrestrained vehicle occupant in a head on collision, and greatly increases facial lacerations, but survival w/scars is judged to be better than death.

      Many attempts have been made over the years to create a non-shattering windshield out of plastic. DuPont had an entire team dedicated to this task in the late 80's and early 90's. The problem they encountered, though, was maintaining the optical properties of a glass windshield. All the various plastic and glass/plastic sandwiches they investigated led to optical distortion when not looking straight through the windshield.

  2. Hmm.... by JoeLinux · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I *ALWAYS* wondered why people whose buildings get tagged wouldn't spray teflon on the side of their building...now I will wonder why they don't use this stuff.

    Sounds pretty cool

    Joe

    1. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I looked into anti-grafitti treatment for my fraternity house in Boston several years ago. Even targeting just the worst spot (~35x10ft brick wall) was excessively expensive compared to renting a sandblaster every three months and spending a Saturday morning cleaning it and paying for repegging the mortar every other year.

      Granted, the level of grafitti problems we had were only only 'nuisance level', the cost of treating the wall astounded me. Even with the treatment we still would have had to rent a pressure washer to clean it and have to redo the teflon every few years. It was much cheaper to sandblast and repair the damage.

      The teflon isn't really a miracle solution.

      I wish I'd caught some asshole tagging the house, but it's probably best that I didn't...I got pretty angry over the thing. We did set up a camera for a while and gave the cops the video, but that had no noticable impact.

    2. Re:Hmm.... by mlynx · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've used a laminate coating created by GBC for an application similar to this. The product isn't teflon, it's Tedlar(tm). It's grafiti and chemical proof (also incredibly thin). I was however able to scratch it. As I understand it, it was developed for outdoor graphics used on bus stops and other public locations. As a test, I coated my ID badge. I can now "alter" my identity with a sharpie at any time.

    3. Re:Hmm.... by JabberWokky · · Score: 2, Interesting
      ...and then the next morning it will be covered with several tags.

      I fail to see how that is a solution in any way other than to get someone to paint it for free.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    4. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Respect...

      Good pieces tend not to attract tags due to respect...

  3. PSP by Mekabyte · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The PSP could really use this.

  4. Will this defeat the marker DRM exploit? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No more marking the edge of CD to defeat the copy protection?

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  5. Re:Odd... by blether · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There was similar hype twenty years ago when CDs first came out, although that was based on supposedly miraculous error correction rather than a miraculous coating.

    A popular science program on UK television had a demo where they scratched CDs, drilled holes in them, covered them in jam, and Look! they still work.

    Of course, it all turned out to be cobblers.

  6. hardness vs. brittleness by morcheeba · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You might as well go all the way and demand something as hard as carbon nanotubes.

    Of course, the penalty of extra hardness is the fact that it becomes brittle. Glass CD's wouldn't scratch, but I'd prefer soft plastic over them any day.

    I've got a synthetic sapphire crystal on my watch, and the rest of it is made of a hardened titanium, and 4 years so far without a single scratch. It's obvious that I've never whacked the crystal hard against a rock.

  7. Re:Uh-oh.. by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Indestructable AOL disks.. *Shivers*

    No, Good! We then have free roofing "tiles" that last forever. You know how much roofing tiles cost?

  8. What about finger prints? by BrewerDude · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Sounds like it would make a great coating for sunglasses, too.

    And, if it makes fingerprints stick less, then that'd be an added bonus. I wonder whether the ink-resisitant properties have any effect on oily or gummy buildups.

    Anyone care to speculate?

  9. other applications might be even more profitable by Bilestoad · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Great - when can I get this coating on my glasses?

  10. CD ViceVersaReversa by Mulletproof · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm hoping they're going to use this stuff as an under/over finish. I've more CDs die from label damage- the least protected side of a CD -than outright read side abuse. All it takes is a minor scatch to that area and the CD becomes an unreadable coaster. ...Which makes it all the more funny to watch people set it on that side, thinking they're protecting the read surface.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  11. Re:What is so horrible about caddies? by Dynedain · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That's because the caddie was a part of the media, just like Zip disks.

    When the caddy sits on your desk, and you have to put the media in it in order to insert it into a drive (like early CD-ROMs and DVD-RAM) it becomes much less consumer-friendly.

    --
    I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
  12. Re:What about the other side? by Cryect · · Score: 2, Interesting

    DVD's, and the new forms of media should as well, have a layer of plastic on the label side as well just as thick as the data side. Fixes thoses issue of worrying about the label side (have to get a pretty deep scratch to damage the data from the label side).

  13. This would be perfect by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 2, Interesting

    for the stalls in bathrooms. Cut down on that stupid graffiti.

  14. I suspect this isnt a NEW development... by riprjak · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As the opthalmic industry has applied scratch resistant coatings with matched refractive indices to polycarbonate lenses for many years now. Indeed, the "wire wool" test is a standard for scratch resistance.

    It seems just a new application of old technology, long overdue IMHO. When I used to work in R&D for one of the major opthalmic lens manufacturers (when they still had R&D) I recall the licensing of our scratch proof coatings to the optical storage industry was mooted on several occasions.

    As the cost of these coatings was prohibitive; often costing up to $12USD per application, I suspect they may have found ways to reduce the cost or they could afford to sacrafice matching of RI or some degrees of scratch resistance.

    Furthermore, I recall an undergrad student doing work with Diamond Like Carbon coating of optical media at a local university several years back. Althought the differing refractive indices of media and coating led to problems.

    Id love to see some REAL detail about this technique and hear if it is possible to apply to existing CDs/DVDs... although back at aforementioned opthalmic R&D lab I coated all of my own CDs/DVDs that I owned at the time... Since the coating was RI matched, it even repaired scratches :)

    err!
    jak.

  15. degradability? by billy+reuben · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How degradable is this supertough coating? How hard will it be for you to get rid of it when you want it to go away? Remember that one of the main selling points of CFC's was that they were very unreactive. As we've all learned within the past couple decades, this was also a bad thing about them, since they were found to be associated with ozone layer depletion. I'm not saying unmarkable AOL CD's will destroy the ozone layer, but I'm thinking that disposal of items covered with this new coating might be a bit more complicated than it would be with conventional, noncoated objects. Thoughts?

  16. Re:I want! by riprjak · · Score: 4, Interesting

    See my post somewhere else here :)... Polymer opthalmic lenses have carried (or have had the option to carry, depending on how cheap you are) scratch resistant coatings for a VERY LONG time... Anti reflective coatings too, tho these are not chemical "films" applied as liquids (as per scratch resisiting) but are thin layers of metal applied using PVD (Physical Vapour Deposition).

    Most of the "hazing" would be due to build up of oils or fluids leaching in from the exposed edges when they are cut for framing.

    Of course, scratch resistant is NOT scratch proof. Not now, not ever.

    Err!
    jak.

  17. Disney DVDs and Kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    That always seemed a low blow to me. When you have kids, you want to be able to plop the DVD in the player and have it start playing immediately to placate a kid who is too young to understand patience.

    Instead, you must wade through banners and trailers because you can't get through them using the navigation features.

    Can kids themselves use this DVD? Not likely, my wife can't, and I can barely navigate it.

    First thing I do with a Disney DVD is copy it to remove all that bullshit.

    I notice another trend (NickleOdeon!) is instead of loading to the main menu, it loads to a little menu which asks you if you want previews or the main menu. Idiots! If I wanted previews, I'd choose it from the special features section!

  18. Rental DVDs by Japong · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If I remember correctly, there was a /. story not that long ago about companies who were planning to make rental DVDs which after a certain period of time would deteriorate when exposed to air because of a special coating - so if you go to Blockbuster you might find yourself choosing between the "Indestructible" and "Self-Destructing" DVD aisles.

  19. Re:Is there a way to save a disk ? by homb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Try to use Brasso, it works great on the bottom side of the disk.
    It's by far the best and cheapest (yes, both) anti-scratch CD/DVD product you can buy.

    I have never tried it on the top side of the disk, but I expect it will work as well as on the bottom side.

  20. Re: No it isn't! by taxevader · · Score: 2, Interesting

    On CD's, yes. On most DVD's, no, the top and bottom layers are of roughly equal thickness.

    I saw most because I have one DVD of 'Shaolin Soccer'.. they 'forgot' to apply the top layer of plastic, so the disc is about half as thick as a normal CD. Its extremely light and flexible, almost like a piece of cardboard. Everyone (ie nerds, geeks) I show it to loves it, but I have to maintain a strict look but dont touch policy. I dont know how much you can bend it and I dont want someone to find out for me!

    Anyway, where was I? Oh thats right, you were wrong. 8)

    --
    -Copyright law #69:Whenever Mickey Mouse is about to enter the public domain,copyrights get extended by 25 years.