Slashdot Mirror


Space Shuttle to re-launch in May

Goeland86 writes "CNN reports that NASA is on it's way to prepare for a shuttle launch in may. Considering the damage caused by the Hurricanes this season, I think it's quite impressive that they're even thinking of a launch next year altogether."

4 of 163 comments (clear)

  1. Scrapping the Shuttle? by Kazrath · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I thought they were scrapping the shuttle? This might of been interesting if it was 20-30 years from now and they were taking their "restored 57 Chevy" out into space. Personally I am to the point where these shuttle flights are a big waste of money "if" they are not doing anything innovative to help the next breed of space capable crafts.

  2. Re:By the grace of God, let's hope NASA's fixed th by ckaminski · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Exactly 1 since the dawn of U.S. manned flight has ended up in the ocean before nominal mission end.

    One was scattered all over the South.

    One caught fire on the launchpad.

    A pretty fucking remarkable record if you consider that a rocket is nothing less than a million pounds of high explosive in a tin can.

  3. Damage? by kzinti · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Considering the damage caused by the Hurricanes this season...

    What damage? The VAB lost a number of sheet-metal panels. The tile fab shop lost a roof. Some other buildings sustained minor water damage. The OPF lost power once or twice. NO FLIGHT HARDWARE WAS DAMAGED. The schedule slip was due as much to the hurricane preparation exercises as to the repair activities. Schedule impact was measured in weeks, not months.

  4. Re:NASA has no choice by igny · · Score: 4, Interesting
    As usual in capitalist world, they put monetary equivalent for the obligations. A couple of years ago Russia was behind their obligations, which put them at ~$60-70mln in debt. Since they didn't have money to compensate, they used barter. Namely, Russian cosmonauts worked on American projects aboard ISS. I don't know exact figures, but they charged $500/hour or so. Russia have also been repaying their debt in the last months by supplying their Soyuzes. Their outstanding balance became officially $0 after that work they did to fix the break circuit in American segment of the ISS (I read somewhere that they charged 500 of work hours for that job).

    From then on NASA has been falling behind. Since Congress prohibited paying cash to Russia, they will use barter again. Now American taxpayers should expect astronauts to work on Russian projects.

    --
    In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra