Slashdot Mirror


Could Nuclear Power Wean the U.S. From Oil?

bblackfrog asks: "Is a Federal nuclear energy program viable? That is, can the USA eliminate our economic dependence on crude oil with a large scale federal program to build and maintain enough nuclear power plants to replace our current oil-based energy needs? The obvious political hurdles are (a) the left opposes nuclear energy, (b) the right opposes federalizing energy, and (c) the oil companies and Saudis wield a lot of clout. This makes a federal nuclear energy program far fetched I admit, however I'm more interested in the economics. Slashdot has covered advances in nuclear power technology. China's doing it." (Read more, below.) "How much energy is required to replace our fossil fuel consumption? What are the initial costs of the program, and just how cheap could the electricity be? How expensive would it be for our industries to convert? How expensive for home and auto conversions? How much of this cost should be picked up by the government? Bottom line: is nuclear power cheaper than our current oil-driven middle-east policy, with all of its blowback?"

24 of 1,615 comments (clear)

  1. Yes, definitely. by krog · · Score: 5, Funny

    A nuclear disaster would wean the US off a lot of things.... oil, food, water, you name it.

    1. Re:Yes, definitely. by bongoras · · Score: 5, Funny

      Come on, get your terminology right!

      In America, it's spelled and pronounced "Nukular" -- for at least four more years.

    2. Re:Yes, definitely. by operagost · · Score: 2, Funny

      People like you are exactly why we are still dependent on oil.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    3. Re:Yes, definitely. by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2, Funny

      In America, it's spelled and pronounced "Nukular" -- for at least four more years.

      Maybe Kerry might have had a chance if he could spout a convincing "Yee Haw!" every once in a while.

    4. Re:Yes, definitely. by PingPongBoy · · Score: 4, Funny

      to harness fusion

      Unfortunately my calculations show the fusion reactor to be the size of a star and must be constructed hundreds of millions of km from the consumers. On the bright side, the gravity of the power plant will be used to sling the earth quickly through the plant's magnetic field thus allowing us to capture enormous power from induction.

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
    5. Re:Yes, definitely. by Rei · · Score: 3, Funny

      Excellent points. I recall a saying that seems relevant... something about "eggs" and "baskets". ;)

      --
      POTUS Witch Hunt tracker: 75 charges filed against 19 witches, 4 witches cooperating and 5 witches have pled guilty.
    6. Re:Yes, definitely. by Raven_Stark · · Score: 2, Funny
      Are you using enriched uranium hand lotion or something?

      I think it's how that new KY jelly works. You know, the stuff with the warming action.


      :)
      --
      http://www.marxist.com/
  2. The Bush Factor by TheSpoom · · Score: 3, Funny

    You're forgetting that Bush was just reelected.

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  3. Obligatory Simpsons by jlechem · · Score: 2, Funny

    I believe it's pronounced nucular.

    --
    Hold up, wait a minute, let me put some pimpin in it
  4. Only when... by slashrogue · · Score: 2, Funny

    Our President can correctly say the word "nuclear" and not a moment before.

  5. Impossible... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...because France have already done it.

  6. Re:And what'll wean us from nuclear power? by iezhy · · Score: 2, Funny

    fusion power, maybe?

  7. Re:(D) One problem by MindStalker · · Score: 3, Funny

    Into the oceans obviously!

    Suprisingly if scattered out this is actually a good idea as there as underwater volcanos are already spilling out much more heavy metals and nuclear material than we can possibly dump, of couse as I said it would have to be ground up and spread out evently.

    Not that the hippies would understand mind you.

  8. Not Biodiesel, Lipodiesel! by bitingduck · · Score: 5, Funny

    yes i know it would take *a lot* of soy crop to meet the US oil consumption

    That's why we need "Lipodiesel"-- when you climb into your SUV, you plug a little hose into a couple stents in your thighs and belly, and it gives you liposuction treatment while you drive, sending the fat into your engine to propel the vehicle. This would solve both the oil problem and the fat problem plaguing the united states, would mean that lazyass drivers wouldn't have to exercise, and could not only eat all the french fries they wanted, they would need to in order to fuel the vehicle. You just stop at the McDonalds drive-thru to fill up.

  9. Re:Privatize by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Funny
    Or deregulate Nuclear energy completely. It's, according to the advocates, completely safe, and I don't think there's any law preventing someone from having their own coal burning generator in their back yard - it's certainly legal to have oil burning generators, as a Floridian I can tell you those things have been a life saver over the last few months...

    So, what we need is for the scientists to come up with mini nuclear reactors people can keep in their back yards. People can buy plutonium rods from the local supermarket, or maybe gas station if there's an issue with safety storing them (as there is with oil), take them home, insert into reactor, and spend another few months with plenty of power.

    If we make them small enough, and our SUVs large enough, we can even use them to power our motor vehicles.

    We live in a society where neither coal nor oil are considered unsafe enough to require serious safety regulations strict enough to keep them out of the hands of ordinary people. And, as every nuclear advocate will tell you, nuclear energy is safer and cleaner than either. It stands to reason we should be throwing away our gas powered generators and furnaces, our living room fireplaces, and our oil burning cars, and replace them with clean'n'safe Nuclear powered equivalents, today!

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  10. Re:And what'll wean us from nuclear power? by hendridm · · Score: 4, Funny
    And what'll wean us from nuclear power?

    A renewable power source that creates guns and beer as its byproduct.

  11. Re:And what'll wean us from nuclear power? by robertjw · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dilithium Crystals

  12. Re:Uh... by micromoog · · Score: 4, Funny
    President Bush approved the building of a new planet last year.

    That's no planet . . . it's a space station!!

    </ob. Star Wars>

  13. Re:Power? by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
    "Unless they really like the idea of killing off 6.3 billion people so 100 million can live in relative comfort."
    Actually, the GOP is looking into this one.

    ::ducks::
    --

    You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

  14. Kitten Power! by Jonboy+X · · Score: 4, Funny
    It sure looks like the U.S. of A. is quickly running out of energy options acceptable to the general population. Recent pools have found that:
    • Coal is dirty.
    • Natural gas smells like farts
    • Oil is controlled by those crazy people with the towels on their heads
    • Wind power is for pansies
    • Hydro will run out as soon as all the water has finished running downhill
    • Nuclear causes explosions and mutants and makes baby Jesus cry

    That's right, the only option that everyone agreed on was:
    • Burning cute, cuddly kittens

    They're adundant (check the animal shelters), cheap (they're just giving the things away) and renewable ("breeder reactor" = 2 cats in a box with some catnip and a Barry White CD). It just goes to show that, with a little ingenuity, we can solve even the worst crises.
    --

    "In a 32-bit world, you're a 2-bit user. You've got your own newsgroup, alt.total.loser." -Weird Al
  15. Outrage by ReciprocityProject · · Score: 3, Funny
    I had to stop eating yoghurt for a month or two.


    This must never, ever, be allowed to happen again. I stand with you, brother.

  16. Re:Have you studied television? by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny
    Did that missing U/Plu go up the chimney? Or out the door in someone's pocket?

    I think Homer Simpson inadvertently walked out with it.

  17. Re:Individually wrapped cheese by josecanuc · · Score: 2, Funny

    In the U.S., it's culturally impolite to cut the cheese. That's why it comes pre-cut and wrapped. ;-P

  18. Re:Better idea by magarity · · Score: 2, Funny

    buy our electricity from the french

    This is a great idea; salt water conducts electricity so we won't even need to lay cables.