Vint Cerf on Internet Governance and Beyond

scebo writes "With the first phase of United Nations World Summit (WSIS) held in Dec of 2003 and the next phase to be held in 2005, there have been extensive debates regarding Internet Governance. Can it be governed? Who should govern it? What is Internet governance? Vint Cerf has offered his own opinion on the subject over at CircleID which attempts to answer some of the key questions raised: 'It has been suggested by some participants in the WSIS discussions that the role of ICANN might be undertaken by the traditional International Telecommunications Union (ITU). While the ITU has served the world as the international forum for the handling of many international issues associated with traditional tele-communications, the Internet has disrupted the neat categorization of various telecommunications media. It is the potential bearer of every form of communication. ICANN has evolved international processes and structures over the last six years to cope with a limited set of issues associated with this rich, complex and rapidly evolving infrastructure. The world needs an effective and well-supported ICANN but the participants in the World Summit on the Information Society and the Working Group on Internet Governance now need to turn their attention to the full panoply of public policy issues that, as discussed above, lie outside the mandate of ICANN. These need a thorough and open airing in this next phase of the World Summit on the Information Society.'"

Comments

Darr.

[Anonymous Coward]

I-Governance?!

BUSH CHENEY TILL JAN. 2009

[Anonymous Coward]

LOL SUCK IT LIBERALS!!! hahahahahaha hahahaha hahahaha

Re:BUSH CHENEY TILL JAN. 2009

[Anonymous Coward]

Forgive me for responding to offtopic/trolling post, but.
Actually all United States citizens will be sucking it in until 2009 as Bush/Cheney continue on their plan to:
2) Step all over our civil liberties
3) Drive the economy downward for the sake of letting big companies make even more money than they do already
4) Widen the gap between poverty-stricken and the elite rich classes
5) Lie to the public
6) and other not nice things

Re:BUSH CHENEY TILL JAN. 2009

[Wavicle]

If the economy is down, how can companies make money?

Economics is a broad subject, and not one of which I am well trained, but... In hard times, large corporations always seem to weather it better than smaller corporations. A down economy translates into less opportunity for a competitor to come from behind and snipe your customers. When the hard times become better, large corporations usually come out better as well.

When the economy is down, the wealthiest few do not suffer, and their wealth is safer than during good times when their investments may decline due to a competitive market.

But anyway, I'm still not an economist so take with the appropriate grain(s) of salt.

Java Ads?!

[Anonymous Coward]

WTF is the deal with the Slashdot ads that are Java applets. Gay. Takes 10 minutes for the freaking page to load.

But thanks, I wasn't going to buy your product before, but that absolutely necessary Java ticker under you ad has made me reconsider. I'll take 2!

Re:Lennon on taking over the government.

[Lodragandraoidh]

Imagine there's no script kiddies
It isn't hard to do
No more spam in my in-box
And no MS Windows too

Re:That was long.

[Anonymous Coward]

Hey I got an idea, If we're too stupid, and lazy to read the article just bash the president.

mmm sour grapes, yum!