Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Google Censors Abu Ghraib Images [updated]

Posted by CmdrTaco on from the smell-the-scent-of-karl-rove dept.

Mihg writes "Try searching Google Images for abu ghraib, lynndie england, or Lynndie's boyfriend charles graner and note how you don't get any pictures of US soldiers torturing Iraqi prisoners of war. Now try it with some of their competitors, like AltaVista, Lycos, or Yahoo!. Google used to be able to find them, as is discussed in this AnandTech forum thread." I'm guessing that this is another case of our administration confusing "National Security" with "Politically Undesirable". Update: 11/07 20:18 GMT by P : Google has a reasonable explanation.

4 of 731 comments (clear)

  1. Continuing This Devil's Dictionary Discussion ... by Baldrson · · Score: 0, Troll
    Yes of course this goes beyond the US or its penal system. That's why sexual sadism was standard practice at Abu Ghraib.

    But if people don't see how much the governments of the US depend on sexual sadism to maintain compliance from their populace the Abu Ghraib immages may mislead them into believing that the locus of the problem is the US military or foreign policy.

    Pathological US behavior around the world is merely a symptom of the sexually sadistic way US governments compell compliance US citizens.

    --
    Seastead this.
  2. Get real... by Baldrson · · Score: 1, Troll

    Do you really think the events at Abu Ghraib would have occurred if US governments hadn't become addicted to racist sexual sadism as a means of extorting compliance out of US citizens?

    --
    Seastead this.
  3. Re:looser demo(crats)ns by howiefl · · Score: 0, Troll

    This is a democratic republic.

    Grow up.

  4. Re:Official Respons from Google. by Monf · · Score: 1, Troll
    ....uuuuh, yeah, right, sure...

    so... if that's the case, i guess google's technologies and hardware aren't all they are touted as, and I guess all us INVESTORS should AVOID INVESTING in GOOGLE, since they are much, much, much, MUCH, MUCH SLOWER at indexing content that pretty much EVERY OTHER search engine has NO PROBLEM indexing quickly...

    --
    Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain.