Shaking Hard Drives Instead of Spinning?
Twyko64 writes "A UK startup called Dataslide aims to develop 'hard drives' made of oscillating sheets of LCD-screen-like material with piezo-electronic actuators and many, many read:write heads. A 'hard drive' could be the same size and shape as an LCD screen. I wrote a this piece on Techworld about it."
I've recently being doing a report for Physics on the Piezoelectric effect, and it is really interesting thing.
When you put a current through a piezoelectric material (e.g. Quartz), it vibrates. The oscillations are used to create sound in Ultrasound Transducers, and they are used in watches as a time measurement.
Conversely, if you mechanically compress a piezoelectric crystal, a charge will occur at the edges. This is used in Ultrasound to detect sound waves, in guitar pickups, and even in those cigarette lighters in cars.
You can read more about it at Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piezoelectric
Just thought this might interest someone.
- Jax
So, if I can take a guess here, they're moving the data instead of the heads? Like bubble memory from ~25 years ago?
(Ouch, I feel old now. I still have an Intel eval kit lying around)
The signal processing done to the analog signal from one read/write head is tremendous. The performance of modern hard drive comes from the signal detection algorithms and advanced error correction that is performed.
You simply cannot do this at low cost when you have got several thousand or million r/w heads.
--- Eat my sig.
The idea isn't that crazy but don't hold your breath waiting to see it actually work either. This idea is a lot closer to pure research than it is to technical implementation.
If you can change the vibration of individual molecules, you could end up with very high storage densities. I can think of lots of reasons why this wouldn't work but the promise is immense.
While I appreciate the reference to "The Innovator's Dilemma", I think it is a complete red herring. This isn't going to be a 'disruptive technology' for a long time if ever.
Greg Ganger and the folks at CMU have worked on sled based MEMS storage devices which use nanotechnology combined with improved materials for higher density electromagnetic storage (like how hard disks work, except the media is on a moving sled). In Ganger's case they explored head motion but decided against it as the area required for equipment to move the heads exceeded the heads range of motion, resulting in reduced storage capacity.
For a background on the technology, check out:
http://yogi.pdl.cmu.edu/research/MEMS/
quote: "storage capacity of 1-10 GB of data in under 1 cm^2 area with access times of under a millisecond and streaming bandwidths of over 50 Mbytes per second."
The research is about 5 years old. Because of constant seek times (the surface agitates in both x and y axes) and a kajillion heads, this is technology really designed to bridge EEPROM versus hard drive access times/throughput.
Think 50 Mbytes per second isn't any great shakes? Keep in mind that this is a chip less than a square centimeter in area, and start thinking of replacing RAID drives with these.
sloth jr