Slashdot Mirror


The Real da Vinci Code

r.jimenezz writes "This month's Wired magazine has a fascinating article about an American roboticist and an Italian scholar who apparently have demonstrated that one of Leonardo's creations, a three-wheeled cart, is actually a 'physically programmable robot'. Very interesting reading."

13 of 235 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Everything but the internet by MrMartini · · Score: 3, Informative

    Of course, we well-informed readers of slashdot all know that Al Gore never actually claimed to have invented the internet...

    http://www.snopes.com/quotes/internet.htm

  2. Re:I thought the first programmer is by Serious+Simon · · Score: 4, Informative

    Electrical? If Ada Lovelace programmed anything, it would have been Charles Babbage's Analytical Machine, which was fully mechanical.

  3. Old news... by DigitalBubblebath · · Score: 5, Informative


    The BBC had an article on this back in April. I think it was on TV, too.

  4. Re:Everything but the internet by strider44 · · Score: 4, Informative

    lol, though it's like taking candy from a baby, I hate to break it to you but he did never actually say that (for both 64k and 640k, which is the actual hoax statement), at least according to Wired News.

  5. Re:Everything but the internet by quigonn · · Score: 4, Informative

    The original quote is (cited from my memory, but I've heard the sound file about a million times): "during my service for the United Status Congress, I took the initiative in creating the internet"

    Another memorable quote from him is "I'm not an expert on computers".

    --
    A monkey is doing the real work for me.
  6. Re:I thought the first programmer is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    He didn't have a wife! He was gay!

  7. Re:Bah ... by pherris · · Score: 2, Informative

    John Fitch (the inventor of the first steam powered boat) tried this design (which failed) before going with his crude "paddle" system (picture six canoe paddles on each side of the boat with an overhead gearing system). Later Robert Fulton (a brilliant engineer in his own right) saw the design and greatly improved it by designing the circular side paddle wheel system.

    --
    "And a voice was screaming: 'Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?'" - HST
  8. Re:Hmmm by groomed · · Score: 2, Informative

    It'd have to be computationally equivalent to a Turing machine.

  9. See Scientific American by dargaud · · Score: 4, Informative

    This machine was covered in Scientific American magazine a couple months ago.

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  10. Cerf & Kahn by Rufus88 · · Score: 3, Informative

    he was intimating that he helped foster the environment where the internet could flourish. Unfortunatly, this is probably not true either

    Wrong. The two men who, more than anyone else, *can* claim to have invented the internet, back up Al Gore on this one.

  11. Re:I thought the first programmer is by goatan · · Score: 3, Informative
    However it was never actually built until a hundred years after his death, as engireeing wasn't of a high enough standard in those days to build the parts he required.

    babbage Not quite When first concieved in 1821 Babbage could find nobody with the skills to make the machine until 1832 see the rest below for why it wasn't completed.

    The Difference Engine The Difference Engine was conceived in 1821 in an effort to mechanise the production of mathematical tables. Unlike the earlier calculators of Schickard, Pascal and Liebniz, the engine was not designed to perform basic arithmetic but to calculate a series of numerical values and automatically print the results. Difference engines were designed to calculate using the `method of finite differences', a well used principle of the time. The advantage of using the method of differences is that it eliminates the need for multiplication and division in the calculation of a particular class of mathematical functions called polynomials. The Difference Engine only used addition which is easier to mechanise than multiplication and division.

    Manufacturing parts for his engines stretched the standards of engineering practice of the time. The intricate shapes required special jigs and tools and the Engines' mechanisms demanded hundreds of near-identical precision parts. Babbage conceived his Engine designs at a time when production techniques were in transition between craft traditions and mass-production and there was not yet the means of producing repeated parts automatically.

    Babbage conducted an extensive survey of manufacturing techniques and practice by visiting manufactures and craft workshops in England and on the Continent. He concluded that the precision and intricacy required for the construction of his Engine were beyond the capabilities of the technology of the day. This study, conducted during the 1820s, formed the basis of his influential book entitled On the Economy of Machinery and Manufactures, published in 1832.

    The design specification for the full size Difference Engine No. 1 required an estimated 25,000 parts which would have had a combined weight of some fifteen tonnes. The Engine, if completed would have stood eight feet high, seven feet long and three feet in depth. Babbage hired Joseph Clement, a skilled toolmaker and draughtsman, to build the Engine. This portion of the Difference Engine, 'the finished portion of the unfinished engine', was completed in 1832 and is among the most celebrated icons in the prehistory of computing. It is the oldest surviving automatic calculator and among the finest examples of precision engineering of the time.

    Babbage benefited from substantial government funding - £17,500. But work on the Engine was halted in 1833 when Clement downed tools following an unresolved dispute over compensation for moving his workshop four miles to new premises near Babbage's house.

    He also designed the Diffrence engine No.2 which was much simpiler than the original but with the same computing power as Diffrence engine No.1.
    --
    Saying Apple is better than MS is like saying Botulism is better than rabies.

  12. Re:I thought the first programmer is by cr0sh · · Score: 3, Informative

    The strange thing was is that Babbage was likely fully aware of a fairly new invention (for the time), known as the "relay". As a mathematician (of great renown, BTW), he was also fully aware of boolean logic, as well as binary arithmetic. In theory, he could have easily based his machine on boolean logic/arithmetic using relays and electricity - but for some reason, chose not to! It wouldn't be until Herman Hollerith in the late 1800's working in America to calculate the census - using punchcard machine tabulators and electricity, to advance down this road (and much later before more work was done to hook these tabulators together into something like a programmable calculator). I find it strange that Babbage didn't take this next step - and at least marry mechanical bits with electrical bits. It wasn't that his ideas couldn't be carried out with the technology of the day - they could. It was more likely Babbage's grander plans and financial issues (along with difficulties with his draftsman/engineer - Thomas something?) that left him from taking that next step. Had he not abandoned the Difference Engine and built it (by abandoning it, and coming up with the better design for the Analytical Engine - after spending a ton of Crown money for the Difference Engine - I can understand his investors backing out) - he would have gotten money to go ahead with the Analytical Engine in full (or, had he conceived the general purpose Analytical Engine first, etc). Furthermore, if he had taken an electrical/mechanical route - he could have likely saved a lot of money in the building of the machine (less precision needed, less machining needed). Ah well - that's history for you...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  13. Wired doesn't get Mark Rosheim by Animats · · Score: 3, Informative
    That article sounds like a Reader's Digest reject.

    Mark Rosheim is a well-regarded designer of industrial robot arms. His "Robot Evolution", is a coffee-table book for mechanical engineers. He's strong on the practical issues academics ignore, like preventing gear-tooth breakage and cable damage in factory operations. Some of his designs are quite elegant. So he's qualified to do this. The article makes him sound like a nut.

    As for automata, it wouldn't be at all surprising for DaVinci to have done entertainment automata. It was one of the few things you could sell in the court-patronage era of mechanics. Understand that in that era, science, art, and mechanism design were hobbies of the rich. This was because you can make beautiful little mechanisms out of brass with hand tools and time, but to make power machinery that does useful work, you need an industrial infrastructure. That didn't come until much later.

    The best early automata are by Jaquet-Droz, and are in a museum in Neuchatel. They still work, being carefully maintained by Swiss watchmakers, and on the first Sunday of each month, they're demonstrated. The Writer writes, with pen and ink, and can be reprogrammed for different messages. The Draughtsman draws, again in pen and ink. The Musician plays the piano. They are all cam-programmmed, and date from the 1700s. Worth a trip if you're in Switzerland. The Writer is probably the best mechanical automaton ever made.