Slashdot Mirror


Kim Peek, aka Rain Man Focus of NASA Study

Bob Vila's Hammer writes "Kim Peek - an autistic man who has been deemed a "mega-savant" for his astonishing knowledge of 15 grand subjects ranging from history and literature, geography and numbers, to sports, music and dates - is a part of a new NASA study to explore the changes in his brain since MRI images were originally taken in 1988. Not only was he the basis of the main character in the movie Rain Man, but he apparently is getting smarter in his specialty areas as he gets older. The study has scientists hoping that technology used to study the effects of space travel on the brain will help explain his mental capabilities."

2 of 366 comments (clear)

  1. Smarter or more knowlegeable? by RealAlaskan · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ... he apparently is getting smarter in his specialty areas as he gets older.

    Smarter or more knowlegeable? If he maintains his fascination in those areas, why would we imagine that he wouldn't gain knowlege?

    Smarter would mean something like ``better able to reason with a given set of information.''

    Since the article is on CNN, I suppose that we shouldn't expect any sort of detail or sense, and not much fact, either.

  2. Re:NASA should keep the study "top secret". by MindStalker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know I shouldn't respond to this troll. But I personally know many chinese, and can tell you they are not morally bankrupt.
    Upon questioning them about Tibet, it is obviously apparant that their government has severily altered the truth. Basically the offical line is that the Tibetians (spelling?) are poor and need Chinas help. Tibet is basically viewed as a welfare state by the rest of China. Many Chinese only want Tibet to be part of their country because they feel compasion and want to help them.

    Sadly I could not convense the chinese I talked to that Tibet was anything different, as they assumed that different views were lies by the Western Media. Oh well. Now the Chinese Government being morally corrupt, I could definatly agree. But, I would not be so quick to assume that the civilians are such.