Slashdot Mirror


How Would You Change U.S. Election Procedures?

kkrista asks: "Ignoring for a moment your opinions on the outcome of the presidential election, what do you feel can be done to improve polling procedures in the U.S.? Verifiable votes seem an obvious necessity, but what else? It seems to me that standardized Federal election procedures would help ensure a fair election." Read on for some of kkrista's ideas -- do you have any better ones?

"How about a credit card-style voter registration card that I have to swipe in order to verify that I am eligible to vote? Such a card could be used to present custom electronic ballots to voters so they do not have to physically vote in their home districts (one could be away on business and within the country's borders or even at an embassy in a foreign country and still vote without an absentee ballot). Federal standards would also put the burden of maintaining proper voting facilities on the Federal government, helping to alleviate issues that can arise with insufficient equipment in less affluent or populous districts. The idea is not to centralize the voting regulations that are currently in place in each state, but rather to centralize and unify the mechanics of casting a vote. Your thoughts?"

1 of 419 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Leave it alone by goatan · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Quick example Abraham Lincoln in 1860 only won 40% of the vote in any other democracy he would have had to form a coalition to or there would have to be another round of voteing with the least popular candidate from the last round removed, yet he got 59% of the Electoral College vote and you know what happened next, 10% is a very big margin of error.

    --
    Saying Apple is better than MS is like saying Botulism is better than rabies.