New Rules Make Domain Hijacking Easier
Tanktalus writes "Netcraft seems to have a little ditty about new rules from ICANN that take effect on Friday making it easier to hijack domain names. Essentially, if someone tries to take your domain, and you don't answer within 5 days, they now assume you are okay with the transfer. Previously, the default answer was no, and you had to explicitly state your acceptance of the domain transfer. Owners of small domains, beware: no more computerless vacations that last more than 4 days at a time!"
This policy fails on SO many counts of interstate trade and transfer and fraud, I can't even count.
Someone else already noticed it'll take about a week forthe first lawsuit to turn this around. I wouldn't be surprised if someone like the EFF (or the FTC - oooh - nemmind - I forgot, they're run by the people they regulate now-a-days) doesn't ask for a prelim injunction against these asshats so it never happens, period.
RS
Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
IANAL but I thought silence could not be used as an agreement to a contract. I learned this in my Business Law class but I guess this doesn't apply here?
2) Notify ICANN to xfer it to you.
3) Spam owner of domain's mailbox with several thousand e-mails for the next five days (make titles of spam look something like ICANN sends).
4) Sell newly aquired domain.
5) Profit!
I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
Time for me to add a domain transfer lock to my domains. I suspect this'll be a popular option from here on out. I'm sorry, ICANN, but I want the default to be that nobody orders or executes changes to my domains without explicit authorization from me, preferably in writing with my signature on it (yes, I'm willing to FAX authorizations as needed).