Slashdot Mirror


Defending Harsh Sentences for Spammers

BMcWilliams writes "Russell McGuire, one of the government lawyers who prosecuted spammer Jeremy Jaynes, has published an article justifying the tough sentence recommended by a Virginia jury. He writes, 'the defense attorney argued that greed cuts both ways and the victims got what they deserved because they were trying to get rich quick. Needless to say, this did not go over well with the jury.' Still, the eye-popping 9-year sentence has even some ardent anti-spammers wondering whether 'proportionality is becoming a completely forgotten concept.'"

7 of 633 comments (clear)

  1. Guess what! Nobody gives a shit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Boy, have you actually smelled a boatload of niggers?

    Have you personally stuck your head below deck and taken a deep whiff when, halfway across the Atlantic, a few of the niggers have died and the shit down there is several inches deep? Has the captain ever ordered you to climb down in the hold to shoot a couple of the nigger bucks for making too much noise?

    God, nothing stinks worse than that. Nothing.

  2. Re:Also consider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Oh shut up.

  3. Re:first post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    learntospellyoufuckingspammer@thisisntafirstamendm entissue.slashdot.org

  4. Re:Contribute to ridiclulous levels of spam by wibskey · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Unlike smoking crack, selling crack actually has victims...

  5. One word after seeing this article by Mr.+Cancelled · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Forehead!

    Seriously, The guy looks like a lightbulb with a wig on. 8)=

    As for the harsh sentences... 9 years is a little high, but oh well. This guy continued abusing the system after the government announced its intentions.

    If thousands of pissed off customers didn't change their mind, and the threat of government action didn't make them stop, what would a light sentence have done? Stopped them for the duration of it probably, but then the guy would have been back out there spamming again soon thereafter.

    Perhaps such a heavy sentence will deter other would-be spammers. I know my daily load of Spam hasn't dropped at all, so I wouldn't mind seeing a few more equally heavy sentences handed down. Maybe other nations should follow (I'm looking at you China!).

  6. Re:Damn right! by DrSkwid · · Score: -1, Offtopic


    hey, drugs are great, don't be such a big baby

    "oh no, teacher said coke was bad, oh no I've taken some, I'm such a bad person, I need punishing"

    it's only chemicals, let be sensible

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  7. Re:Also consider by gfxguy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Laugh, but repeated harrasment IS a crime. The parents should be fined.

    --
    Stupid sexy Flanders.