Slashdot Mirror


How Journalists Distort Science with Balance

The scientist's job is to discover truth about the natural world, and the journalist's is to report the world's events accurately. Why are these two professions so often at odds? Chris Mooney discusses how journalism fails science in this month's Columbia Journalism Review. If you applauded Jon Stewart's plea to "stop hurting America," Mooney's analysis will strike a chord; the he-said-she-said approach to truth fails in all kinds of venues. (via: WorldChanging)

5 of 826 comments (clear)

  1. fpf pf fpfpfp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    First post! I pwn! f0rm kdawg

  2. Re:404 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    wow pointing out and error and first post in the post
    yay my first ever first post

  3. Re:Not just Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    As part of the telecom deregulation in the mid 90s, a legal requirement was lifted that had previously required the media to give equal time to both sides of an argument. Without giving any discussion as to why the regulation was eliminated, before you had the news, as you say, arguing for the status quo. Now, you get FoxNews.

    I have no point in this, just adding a bit of data. It is always interesting to consider, however, if "unbiased" communication is even 1) possible, and 2) worth while.

  4. frost p1st by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Continues to lose Are aatending a everyday...Redefine

  5. ATTN: MODERATION ABUSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    The parent comment was a direct, ontopic reply to a comment in the story. Modding overrated is a blatant abuse of moderation powers.

    If you don't agree, reply, or mod it as flamebait. By using over/underrated, it's clear the mods are trying to avoid m2, to simply mod comments which they don't agree this.

    I hope the editors rectify this, and blacklist these moderators from now on.