Slashdot Mirror


Warezed SoundForge Files In Windows Media Player

An anonymous reader writes "German PC-Welt magazine reports that Microsoft used an illegal copy of SoundForge 4.5 (Google translation) for editing Wave files shipped with Windows Media Player. You can check that yourself by opening any file in the [Windows location] \Help\Tours\WindowsMediaPlayer\Audio\Wav\ folder in notepad or other editors of your choice and looking at the last line. There you will find a reference to SoundForge 4.5 and also a user called 'Deepz0ne' who happens to be one of the founders of an audio software cracking group called Radium."

16 of 1,001 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Lessons to learn by Justus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, nice justification! They did something wrong so that means I can do it too!

  2. Re:A few angles... by mgv · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Optimist's response: Maybe they were waiting for their activation code. Pessimist's response: They knowingly stole it. Realist's response: Even Microsoft has no use for MS Sound Editor.

    The question it rasises is how much other stuff is in windows that has IP violations? The answer is: Nobody knows. Probably not even MS know, and a nobody else is in a position to analyse it. By the time it gets found and publicised, its been in the operating system for a long time.

    Michael

    --
    There is no cryptographic solution to the problem where the intended receiver and the attacker are the same entity.
  3. Re:Not a big deal really by B'Trey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And how many times has Microsoft's lapdog BSA audited some one, found a piece of Microsoft warez that some employee had pirated and fined the hell out of the company for it? That's what makes this newsworthy.

    --

    "The legitimate powers of government extend only to such acts as are injurious to others." Thomas Jefferson.

  4. Ummm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Who needs the linked JPG? Just go to the directory in question: $WINDOWS\Help\Tours\WindowsMediaPlayer\Audio\Wav

    ...Maybe those who don't have/use Windows might need the Jpeg?

  5. Re:So when does it stop being 'opinion' by Martin+Blank · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It may well have been one impatient user. There's at least one in every company I've ever been at. Usually we just chuckle at them behind their backs and do what we can to make sure proper licensing procedures are followed (including changing admin passwords where necessary and hoarding new software behind locked doors) when there's no one willing to fire the person. The company ends up paying for the software in most cases as it's supposed to, but if an audit were ever done, a few software keys wouldn't quite match up even though the counts would be roughly correct.

    --
    You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
  6. The real lesson by zakezuke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    With all the BILLION$ of dollars M$ has they can't even pony up the money for Sound Forge?

    Have you tried getting management to buy the software required for a project? At times it's damn near impossible. You have a deadline and your request is moving at the speed of bureaucracy. Finally you say *fuck it* and get the damn software. This becomes a vicious circle when management asks, "Oh you didn't need us to buy this software before why do you need it now? Just do what you did before."

    I'm not saying this is good or bad, this is just the way it happens. Management holds no accountability because it's their job to be a dumb ass. Being a dumb ass isn't illegal and saves the company money. They didn't pirate the software, some peon did.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    1. Re:The real lesson by DavidTC · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The answer to that would be: No, I am not empowered to agree to contracts on behalf of the company, and thus I really don't feel empowered to agree to them and violate them at the same time!

      Why don't you pirate it, Mr. Manager Man?

      Don't put up with violating the law, or even violating company policy, to get around stupid-ass restrictions that are keeping you from doing your job. Stand firm and complain continually about the policy failure. If your company has a process to make suggestions or complain about policies, use it exactly how you're supposed to. When asked why you don't hit deadlines, pull out documentation of how this policy hindered you and you couldn't get it changed.

      We, the workers, need to stop putting up with this crap. Either they give us the tools to do our job (Or let us go get them.), or we're just going to stand there and point out they've hired us to do a job and not given us the tools. Don't go and get the tools in violation of company policy.

      A friend of mine got in a similiar sitution recently. It seems, he's on the IT staff of a company, and they'd adding computers. Well, for some completely idiotic reason, the electricians wire the network. So he put in a work order for eight drops in this room, and, three weeks later, when they came in, only two of the drops actually worked. So he's talking about what he's going to do, is is he going to get a hub and have reduced bandwidth to this important machines, or maybe stick some of them in another room until another work order goes this, or maybe, against the rules, take off the faceplates of the jacks and try to fix the wiring, or what, and I just stare at him.

      Then I say: The electricians didn't do their job. They probably don't know how to do it correctly, so it's not their fault, it's the fault of whoever put in such a stupid-ass rule, but still...the work order is not complete. Don't try to figure out a way around the rules. Go and tell them you're only able to do 1/4th your job, because only 1/4th of the work you need done (And was okayed to be done!) was actually done. If they want this to not happen again, they could actually let people who know how to wire a network cable run it, or at least put the ends on.

      Because figuring out ways around the rules is not your job. If the rules are not correct, yes, you need to point that out, and maybe even suggest new rules. If management does not listen to you, it is not your job to do your work in violation of said rules. If they make you sweep with a shovel instead of a broom, by God, sweep with a shovel. Don't sneak a broom out when they aren't looking.

      Of course, companies could actually start trusting workers again, and I'm sure some do. But if they did, you'd know, because you wouldn't have stupid procedures you need to work around in the first place!

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  7. Re:A few angles... by kfg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The question it rasises is how much other stuff is in windows that has IP violations?

    And the answer it provides is that the idea that closed soure software somehow becomes magically free of stolen or infringing code is fallacious.

    At best it provides the bliss of ignorance, but an ignorance difficult or impossible to correct.

    KFG

  8. Re:Lessons to learn by Kosi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, but they are responsible for the actions of their employees. And they should be held to be.

    Just imagine a small company where some guy runs a illegal copy of Windows XP. Sure they would be sued or threatened with it to pay the license fee plus something. Same procedure should be applied to MS.

  9. Re:Best Friend! by zurab · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Are you kidding? I want homeland security on the case ASAP. I also want BSA to send threatening letters to all Microsoft departments and offices and force them to audit their licensed software and code copyrights - or else they'll break down the doors with the assistance of Secret Service and seize all their assets! You know, irresponsible IP thieves and pirates like these are the criminals that are forcing software industry to lose $50.7 trillion (or whatever number it is) per year.

  10. That's true but don't pretend it was intentional by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, Microsoft is liable and will have to pay Sony (if their employee was the one responsible). However having an employee do something they shouldn't is VERY different from willful infringement.

    The problem is people seem to be blaming Microsoft as though they willfuly ripped off Sonic Foundry (now Sony) to save some money. Please, Sound Forge is like $250, it's nothing to them. More likely, whoever was responsible for it, maybe not even an MS employee (they may have contracted this out) just liked SF and used it instead of whatever app they had licensed.

    Still their responsibility to pay for it, but don't pretend it was them being evil. They don't monitor the every move of their employees.

    Interesting counter question: How many OSS Windows apps are compiled using a warezed version of Visual Studio?

  11. BSA audits by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Ok. Next time your company gets audited by the BSA(another beast we can thank MS for), and they find one or two pirated copies of software, that employees installed without authorization, and use that as justification to charge you for the audit, to the tune of several millions of dollars, remember what you just said today.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
  12. Re:Lessons to learn by Dashing+Leech · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Fascinating theory you have there.

    I think you miss his point. Yes, pirating Windows is wrong and illegal, even if Microsoft uses pirated software. That's because "hypocricy" doesn't have legal standing. But it does have standing in the realm of public opinion. Nobody would particularly cry for MS if they claim that they're loosing money to piracy. (Not that anyone would cry for MS now, we just cry because of MS.) It's a credibility thing. There's a difference between doing something that's wrong and feeling bad about it.

    Personally, I hope it makes the "powers that be" realize that piracy by private corporations for profit is more harmful than piracy for personal use at home.

  13. Re:Lessons to learn by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Yeah, I will. It's called fucking hypocrisy."

    Wouldn't a hypocrite be the best person to get advice from? I mean, I'd pay more attention to a smoker telling me not to smoke than a non-smoker.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  14. Re:Lessons to learn by Raffaello · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "The law an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind."
    Mohandas Gandhi

    The implication is that everyone has committed some offense against some other person in his or her lifetime. If the only form of justice available were retribution, then the entire population of the world would be savaged. Imagine the torments you would have to undergo if every single wrong you have ever done in your life had to be repaid in kind.

    I believe another famous religious leader had something similar to say about the idea of justice as retribution:

    He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her. John, 8:7.

    Justice as retribution is only ever advocated by hypocrites, because all of us have committed offenses against others.

  15. Re:Lessons to learn by Spankophile · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How many times does it have to be pointed out to you morons that BEING ILLEGAL DOESN'T MAKE IT WRONG!... it just won't sink in!