Slashdot Mirror


Iraq law Requires Seed Licenses

Doc Ruby writes "The American Administrator of the Iraqi CPA (Coalition Provisional Authority) government, Paul Bremer, updated Iraq's intellectual property law to 'meet current internationally-recognized standards of protection.' The updated law makes saving seeds for next year's harvest, practiced by 97% of Iraqi farmers in 2002, the standard farming practice for thousands of years across human civilizations, newly illegal. Instead, farmers will have to obtain a yearly license for genetically modified seeds from American corporations. These GM seeds have typically been modified from IP developed over thousands of generations by indigenous farmers like the Iraqis, shared freely like agricultural 'open source.' Other IP provisions for technology in the law further integrate Iraq into the American IP economy."

5 of 284 comments (clear)

  1. Before all the "use other seeds" posts.. by Jukashi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The U.S. regime will most likely criminalize the use of the olds seeds. And even if they do not its only a matter of time before the new seeds will "find" a way into their crops and the patent holders will begin to extort the iraqi farmers. Think its a conspiracy theory? It's already happening. IN CANADA

  2. Re:Mod story = Most people didn't bother reading by Jagungal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know this is /. but the problem especially in this one is that most people here are shooting from the hip and not bothering to read the story.

    The Story is about the US changing the laws regarding GM Seeds - not the Iraqis changing them. Previously in Iraq (and it still should be) it was illegal to sell a seed and say that you could not save the seeds from the plants. It is a pretty simple principle - you buy the seed, you can breed from it.

    One way of looking at it is that seeds always have been kind of GPL - you get them for free .. and any changes you make are passed on to others .. who again improve them. This one is about companies getting something that was produced by someone else .. making small changes and then trying to licence it back - license something that was like GPL and not thier total IP in the first place. Iraq rightly IMO had laws against this.

    It should be that if GM seed companies don't like the Iraqi law then they should not sell thier seeds in Iraq.

    Nobody in Iraq would want to be controlled by a foreign country and have thier food supplies dependent on seeds from that country.

    Read the story dudes.

  3. Re:IP pollution by Jahf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is this problem that will eventually cause the downfall of the GM licensing rules as they exist right now (note: I'm not saying it will kill GM as a method or product).

    Take for instance recent studies that show that grain that was grown in the U.S. and exported to Mexico for -food- and not in the form of meant-for-planting-seeds has mixed in with the Mexican corn crops.

    The Mexicans did not plant the GM seeds, they don't -want- GM seeds, but now they have them. By some interpretations of the current rules it means that the Mexican farmers (if they were in the states) would be unable to replant their existing crops nor sell the seeds elsewhere because they contain protected IP.

    Ridiculous. Talk about viral licensing ;)

    The end result is that there is a law on it's way from Mexico stating that any corn imported from the U.S. has to be labelled GM (or GM free, which is rapidly becoming impossible) -and- milled before entry into Mexico. Even then Murphy states that some kernels will make it through the process whole and/or migrate naturally and the GM genes will continue to migrate.

    Yep ... this exactly what anti-GM folks have been saying for years ... once a new gene gets into the wild and it provides benefits, it will naturally propogate. It is called Evolution (except in Kansas and Georgia ... and I get to make that joke since I grew up in one and lived in the other for awhile) and we are most definitely tampering with it.

    --
    It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
  4. no choice by zogger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It will be here soon, too. Pollen is airborne. Eventually you won't be able to save your own seed, and they have proven they can control the law and court system to the extent that if the pollen infects your crops, you "stole" their "patented" IP. It's why those of us who have been against this have been speaking up about it. Their plant "IP" law is viral, and you can't get away from it once it's released into the wild to grow. Google starlink corn, canola, superweed for starters.

    You cannot both "support it" and think you or anyone else can have any practical alternative. Joe farmer down the street has IP protected corn, you don't, next year the seed you save from your own crop that had nothing to do with the patented stuff will have a certain percentage of "their" genetic material in it. You lose. Every crop you try to grow will become more infected. The wind and the law won't allow it. It's only a matter of time now before global food monopolies. And in iraq you can see they aren't even waiting for it to spread semi naturally, they are just mandating it, showing exactly where they have always been coming from, exactly like we have warned against and been told it was "tinfoil hat" or "luddism". Now here, you see the proof, what they intend for not only iraq, but the planet, as much as they can.

  5. Re:Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Having just read the chapter of "The Law" that was added for the "protection of new varieties of plants" I think I can safely say that Mr. Bremer is paving a new path for our world domination.

    By including the R&D of third world countries into our patents (when those countries have no IP relationship with us at all) THEN invading their country and supplanting such arduous unwanted agreements and regulations on the conquered third world country, we guanrantee their eternal indentured-servant status.

    They have modified their crops for hundreds of years, and our patents have incorporated their research. Why would a farmer there care if someone in the US used their discoveries for a patent that only affects the US? Now, the tables are turning, and they suddenly do have to care?

    Seems like a nice way to make every Iraqi farmer go quickly bankrupt, selling all their holdings to US corporations that are extorting huge sums of money for seeds the Iraqi farmers invented in the first place.

    I don't see people starting, but I do see the farm ownership changing from ~100% Iraqi owned to 99% US owned within five years.