Slashdot Mirror


Exploitation of Open Source VoIP

n8twj writes " With John 'Maddog' Hall pointing out that Open Source VoIP will be bigger than Linux ever has been. How can we be sure that un-ethical companies will not try to steal code that is covered under the GPL and try to pass it off as their own? Recently, I have become aware that SysMaster has been redistrbuting a version of the Asterisk PBX written by Mark Spencer from Digium and many others. SysMaster claims that they wrote everything in-house, while they have surely done their own development, they are using Asterisk to power their product line without following the rules. In terms of full disclosure, my company also provides Asterisk-based solutions, however we have fully embraced Asterisk and gladly contribute back to the GPL."

4 of 156 comments (clear)

  1. Motive by oniony · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is this a serious question or an attempt to discredit a competitor?

    --

    Powered by onion juice.

  2. Re:ah the /. crowd by mcc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So it looks to me like "the /. crowd" has a general lack of moral outrage over people sharing copyrighted material for free without the person being shared with buying a license, but does have moral outrage over people taking copyrighted material, repackaging it, presenting it as their own work, and selling it to others for a profit in violation of license.

    So... congratulations! You have demonstrated that the slashdot community has two different consensus viewpoints on two different issues.

    Something analogous to gpl violations in the music world would be not file-sharing, but bootlegging-- people who bulk-fabricate copies of commercial CDs and then sell them-- a practice which I've yet to see anyone on slashdot defend.

  3. Re:lobby your government officials by Otter · · Score: 5, Insightful
    In fact, I suggest that FSF and others lobby the government to have open source licenses registeres with an agency. Any software released under a registered license will have that license protected by the government. The simple establishment of the rules should scare most out of eploitation.

    Yeah, I propose calling it "copyright" and setting up a US Copyright Office to enforce it.

  4. Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How can we be sure that un-ethical companies will not try to steal code that is covered under the GPL

    Easy - just keep backups. That way, if somebody steals your code, you still have it.

    Oh... wait. Did you mean copyright infringement and not theft? When the RIAA and MPAA start talking about those nasty thieves, people are quick to point out that copyright infringement is not theft.

    Double-standards stink. When somebody infringes upon the GPL, it's not theft, so don't exaggerate your grievance or accuse the other party of crimes they didn't commit. It just makes you look like a whiny liar and doesn't help your case.