Slashdot Mirror


X-43A Mach 10 Mission Scrubbed For Today

An anonymous reader writes "NASA's third X-43A hypersonic research mission has been scrubbed for today due to technical glitches with X-43A instrumentation. When the issues were addressed, not enough time remained in the launch window."

3 of 98 comments (clear)

  1. Re:99% success? by Anubis350 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    more like a good test, where if 99% of the compenents work but 1% doesnt they dont fly until they solve that 1%. Haste is no reason for sloppiness, NASA's engineers are doing things properly here

    --
    "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
  2. Re:Some questions I have... by nicnak · · Score: 5, Insightful
    1) It cheats. It uses a booster rocket to get 90% of its velocity.

    It is not a test to see how fast it can get going, but rather a test to see if it can sustain flight at a speed faster than any other air breathing vehical has ever done.

    2) it's smaller than a car

    It is mearly a test. If they built one full size and then threw it away in the ocean, the public would be screaming bloody hell about all the wasted money. They are trying to be as efficiant as possilbe with these tests on a limited budget.

    NASA knows that if it screws up too much it's funding will be cut. I know what it's like to work under such circumstances and it makes you not take risks. That's the sadest thing is that NASA is supposed to be about pushing the limits. About discovering new things, breaking new records and now they are strugling just to stay alive.

  3. Re:99% success? by Rei · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How, exactly, is "fixing a problem in a hand-made experimental craft, that was revealed by a well-planned and thorough inspection" considered "incompetance"? I'd call that about as good of an organizational plan as you could have for an experimental project like the X-43.

    > how do you think the Civil Airline industry
    > would work if 1 plane in 100 crashed?

    Awful analogy. Airplanes are mass-produced, mass operated commodity machines.

    Better analogy: How would people react in the middle ages if 1 ocean exploration mission out of 100 sank?

    Answer: They'd cheer for their astounding success, and give proper credit where it was due, unlike you people that know almost nothing about rocketry or NASA experimentation beyond the shuttle and ISS, who never miss an opportunity to bash all that NASA has accomplished.

    --
    Nobody pushes buttons like our bunny. Big red buttons with labels that say "IGNITION", apparently.