Slashdot Mirror
Netscape Reborn?
An anonymous reader writes "BetaNews reports that Netscape has been revived with Firefox backing. 'Despite media reports and industry pundits over the years relegating Netscape to Internet history books, AOL has restarted the browser's development. The company plans to bring back a refreshed Netscape browser based on Firefox.'"
... live longer.
Well, the post war era will show.
CC.
TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
Maybe AOL has finally understood that their previous strategy was not optimal in the long run, if IE wins hands down(as it has almost done) so that there is no competition, will Microsoft then still play with the ISPs, or will they start requiring use of their server sofware and such "to be fully supported"
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Peoples memories of Netscape and the brand are not good now, why bother with this, why not just back the Mozilla name and at the same time unite to take on Internet Explorer.
If they do this, it just means browser stats will start to show up as something like IE 50%, Mozilla Firefox 25%, Netscape 20% which would totally obscure the actual success of Firefox.
(Don't bother debating the values I've used, they are totally fictional and not meant to even be predictions)
Would someone mind trying to explain what the point of all this is? Why would I choose a Netscape branded version of Firefox, repleat with pre-set home and search pages aimed at generating ad revenue for one of largest companies in the U.S., when I could simply download and install the free and fully function version from Mozilla.org? Plus, are they going to ensure compatibility with all the existing extensions? Why is Slashdot even interested in following Netscape anymore? The last time I visited their homepage, I really had to dig to find the browser.
This is one of the things I don't get about open source. Don't the developers of Mozilla open them selves for exploitation developing these projects and then allowing companies like AOL to basically take all their hard work, re-brand it, then make money off of it? We have a few "internet appliances" in the office which are basically just Linux distributions with a fancy web gui to control them. Yet these companies make boatloads of money selling other people's work. The original programmers don't even get credited! Is it time for some sort of new GNU? Something that protects the effort these buys put into everything by ensuring that the projects they create can't make _someone else_ rich? Or am I totally ignorant to how this all works?
The feeling that your browser window was about to crash, the feeling of boredom while it loaded.
C'mon, Netscape of old was inferior to IE. With Firefox it's finally matured into something decent, both in terms of appearance and performance.
I'd almost say Netscape RIP, the brand does a diservice to Mozilla, people will remember the old clunky Netscape and think Firefox is like that.
Gotta be precise here. Netscape the company went foom, but Netscape the browser just got a new name and a new set of priorities, and IMHO became much better as FOSS.
I really don't see the point of another "Netscape" release, for the customer. It'll probably be just like the previous one: the current best from Mozilla with a bucketload of advertising gunk poured over it. Who needs it? Some of my favorite changes as NS Communicator became Mozilla were the things they took out.
I certainly do see the attraction for AOL, though: they can sell areas of the UI like billboard space.
Netscape 4.x was inferior to IE 4+, that is certain.
However, Netscape Navigator 3 was far superior to it's IE version counterpart.
Ofcourse anyone on internet would hav heard the word "Netscape".BUt mostly theyll have in mind as a browser that existed once,and since has been dead,isnt famous and not seen" these days.".
So Netscape,Mozilla,Firefox are all one and the same after all?
Why does yahoo do this
Turn your flagging product code over to nameless unwashed masses who chip away at improvements and kick in a few great new features. Then a few years later, harvest the improved code and restart your business. I may be cynical. I may be assuming too much about netscape re-appropriating Firefox/Mozilla code. But AOL is NOT the nicest or most deserving entity to receive such a boon from Netscape's original dicision to open up mozilla code. Our tolerance of AOL must be that we all just hate Microsoft and want somebody to stand up against MS.
SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
Most people know however, that Netscape was 'defeated'.
Why would you market a browser brand name that was already defeated handily by Internet Exploder? Most people know this, and others will simply ask their friends "Is Netscape any good?" with the simple reply, "I don't know, but I use Internet Exploder."
What do you think people will buy into more easily?
The price is always right if someone else is paying.
Most rewrites also happen in parts. So that while at the end everything is rewritten during development you have rewritten code and old code sitting next to each other so that you have some working product.
So Netscape is still Mozilla's daddy.
This is not just nitpicking. Starting from scratch is a totally different approach to development then doing a complete rewrite. With a rewrite if you do it right you can have working product to show your achievements so far at an earlier stage. If you start again from scratch you lose the baggage of old code being used but you also need to build everything before you can show your product.
MMO Quests are like orgasms:
You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.
I think that Epiphany is a good browser. Sure, it lacks the feature-set of Firefox, but the most important stuff is there. It's fast (is a genuine Gnome/GTK application), has tabs (which handle better than Firefox, in my opinion), and uses the same renderer. Drawbacks are that it is a bit unstable with some Mozilla plugins and can't use many of those great Mozilla extensions. As a browser though, it's simple and operates well with other Gnome apps and handlers.
Not here.
The new guy in Legal just requested Firefox.
Management have OKed it, I just installed it.
There were already 3 unofficial installs, now the landslide begins. 4 down, 496 to go.
Off topic, but I've gotta' say it. Firefox used to require a proxyserver password, and we have to change every 30 days. Now it uses the login credentials like IE. The last barrier to corporate deployment here.
It's never too late to have a happy childhood.