Slashdot Mirror


Netscape Reborn?

An anonymous reader writes "BetaNews reports that Netscape has been revived with Firefox backing. 'Despite media reports and industry pundits over the years relegating Netscape to Internet history books, AOL has restarted the browser's development. The company plans to bring back a refreshed Netscape browser based on Firefox.'"

9 of 413 comments (clear)

  1. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  2. The Mozilla brand is probably stronger now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Peoples memories of Netscape and the brand are not good now, why bother with this, why not just back the Mozilla name and at the same time unite to take on Internet Explorer.

    If they do this, it just means browser stats will start to show up as something like IE 50%, Mozilla Firefox 25%, Netscape 20% which would totally obscure the actual success of Firefox.

    (Don't bother debating the values I've used, they are totally fictional and not meant to even be predictions)

  3. What's the point? by stevenbdjr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Would someone mind trying to explain what the point of all this is? Why would I choose a Netscape branded version of Firefox, repleat with pre-set home and search pages aimed at generating ad revenue for one of largest companies in the U.S., when I could simply download and install the free and fully function version from Mozilla.org? Plus, are they going to ensure compatibility with all the existing extensions? Why is Slashdot even interested in following Netscape anymore? The last time I visited their homepage, I really had to dig to find the browser.

  4. Some things I don't get about open source by ieatglue0111 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is one of the things I don't get about open source. Don't the developers of Mozilla open them selves for exploitation developing these projects and then allowing companies like AOL to basically take all their hard work, re-brand it, then make money off of it? We have a few "internet appliances" in the office which are basically just Linux distributions with a fancy web gui to control them. Yet these companies make boatloads of money selling other people's work. The original programmers don't even get credited! Is it time for some sort of new GNU? Something that protects the effort these buys put into everything by ensuring that the projects they create can't make _someone else_ rich? Or am I totally ignorant to how this all works?

  5. Re:Bah by gilesjuk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The feeling that your browser window was about to crash, the feeling of boredom while it loaded.

    C'mon, Netscape of old was inferior to IE. With Firefox it's finally matured into something decent, both in terms of appearance and performance.

    I'd almost say Netscape RIP, the brand does a diservice to Mozilla, people will remember the old clunky Netscape and think Firefox is like that.

  6. Re:Bah by mwood · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Gotta be precise here. Netscape the company went foom, but Netscape the browser just got a new name and a new set of priorities, and IMHO became much better as FOSS.

    I really don't see the point of another "Netscape" release, for the customer. It'll probably be just like the previous one: the current best from Mozilla with a bucketload of advertising gunk poured over it. Who needs it? Some of my favorite changes as NS Communicator became Mozilla were the things they took out.

    I certainly do see the attraction for AOL, though: they can sell areas of the UI like billboard space.

  7. Re:Bah by the+unbeliever · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Netscape 4.x was inferior to IE 4+, that is certain.

    However, Netscape Navigator 3 was far superior to it's IE version counterpart.

  8. whoa! isn't that a clever use of open source! by museumpeace · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Turn your flagging product code over to nameless unwashed masses who chip away at improvements and kick in a few great new features. Then a few years later, harvest the improved code and restart your business. I may be cynical. I may be assuming too much about netscape re-appropriating Firefox/Mozilla code. But AOL is NOT the nicest or most deserving entity to receive such a boon from Netscape's original dicision to open up mozilla code. Our tolerance of AOL must be that we all just hate Microsoft and want somebody to stand up against MS.

    --
    SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
  9. Re:Bah by SpinyManiac · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Not here.

    The new guy in Legal just requested Firefox.
    Management have OKed it, I just installed it.
    There were already 3 unofficial installs, now the landslide begins. 4 down, 496 to go.

    Off topic, but I've gotta' say it. Firefox used to require a proxyserver password, and we have to change every 30 days. Now it uses the login credentials like IE. The last barrier to corporate deployment here.

    --
    It's never too late to have a happy childhood.