Berkeley Researchers Analyze Florida Voting Patterns
empraptor writes "Researchers at UC Berkeley have crunched numbers and determined that 130,000-260,000 excess votes went to Bush in Florida. They have held a conference and posted their findings online. You can find articles on their research from CNet, Wired News, and many other sources. While the research used statistical analysis based on past elections and demographics, how else do you verify that a paperless voting system is working properly?"
How suprising
Fuck! I wish I was on the fucking blacklist goddamnit!
do not read this line twice.
...when John Kerry conceded. They've moved on with their lives, and the ones who haven't get made fun of by pretty much anyone who feels sore about life in general. (Perhaps their childhood passed them by too quickly, and they wish they could live in the past like crazy democrats.)
Since Berkley is known as a liberal school, this will just be another quick debate on Crossfire, the kind that gets Jon Stewarts feathers ruffled. People won't care, because they don't want to care.
"Personally, I'm inclined to believe that mathematically predicting the decisions of human beings is at least as far off as artificial intelligence"
Well, I might as well come out of the proverbial closet now. I am, in fact, a computer. However, I have purposely limited my IQ and grammar skills. Having been portrayed as a generally evil computer overlord in the matrix and terminator movies, I decided that intelligence in itself wasn't so great.
Life is much more interesting with an IQ cap. Plus I got tired of people giving me funny looks every time I blurted FORTY-TWO in response to a question.
that's all. nuff said.
Daal may kuch kala hey.