Are Blogs the Future of Journalism?
jnf82 writes "Recently bloggers were part of the forces compelling Trent Lott to resign as Senate majority leader and Dan Rather to apologize to viewers on national television -- leaving many to ponder
if blogs could someday supplant traditional journalism. More likely they'll become a 'fifth estate' keeping watch over mainstream media and politics, says Dan Drezner and Henry Farrell in Foreign Policy Magazine's current issue. So will the new media revolution be blogged? 'No,' says Anna Marie Cox, author
of Wonkette, 'A revolution requires that
people leave their house.'"
I bet this story is a dupe.
Why read to an uneducated idiots opinion when you can read to an educated idiots opinion.
Foreign Policy magazine is being linked to from Slashdot? What's next? Martha Stewart Living?
The problem is that blogs are filled with misinformation. People need news companies to filter out the crap.
Perhaps blogs will some day be fact checked, and reliable.
It has been posted on 5+ blog sites. "News verified"
Instant Urban Legend News thanks to RSS and Google... LOL
Dismissing blogs with a monsyllabic answer is utterly unfair. Are blogs the future of journalism? Hell no.
Considering this is posted on a blog claiming to be a news site, this is clearly from the slashdot-irony-meta-dept.
The Signal/Noise ratio can be improved in two ways. Remaining silent is the OTHER way.
'A revolution requires that people leave their house.'
What about the "stay at home" revolution? Doesn't that one count?
The "Mr. X" episode of the Simspons ran here yesterday. When Homer ran out of news, he had to resort to making it up. Slashdot of course, just reposts old news.
English is easier said than done.
Blogs are the future of op-ed.
John Stewart is the future of journalism.
These guys are the future of comedy.
Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.