Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Thomson Releases MP3 Surround

Posted by CowboyNeal on from the bouncing-around-the-room dept.

Anonymous Howard writes "Thomson has released MP3 Surround, a new MP3 codec. They claim that MP3 Surround supports high-quality multi-channel sound at bit rates comparable to those currently used to encode stereo MP3 material, resulting in files half the size of common compressed surround formats while maintaining backwards compatibility. Wasn't MP3 Pro supposed to be a great new MP3 codec, but never took off? I wonder if this is going to go the same route. Does anyone have a technical view of MP3 Surround? Does it have potential?"

11 of 283 comments (clear)

  1. No by pcmanjon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, with so much of the internets illegal mp3's already encoded I don't think it will take off.

    I mean, theres terabytes out there in mp3 format, and it'd be too much hassle for everyone who has encoded their personal collection to this new mp3 format.

    It could take off, but unlikley. If it does, there will be a mix of the two formats, traditional mp3, and this new type.

    1. Re:No by MrResistor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My guess is that the question is largely irrelevant, at least from Thomson's point of view. The technology is very useful to Thomson, and it's really just gravy if someone else wants to license it from them (granted, it could be a lot of gravy, but that isn't why they developed it).

      You see, Thomson sells stuff under 4 brand names: consumer electronics are sold under Thomson (mainly in Europe) and RCA, and content production products under Technicolor and Grass Valley (a big name in TV production equipment). One of the areas they're particularly strong is Digital Video Servers, most of which are MPEG based. One of the big limitations on what you can do with those servers, especially when you're dealing with HD, is the bandwidth of the storage media. Anything that reduces the amount of bandwidth any given feature requires is good stuff. So this is a very useful technology for Thomson, and of course it will be a must have for anyone wanting to communicate with Thomson/Grass Valley video servers (which would be anyone in professional video production).

      It may or may not take off in the consumer market, but rest assured it will do just fine in the pro market.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  2. It could be used in games. by Knetzar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To me this codec seems more useful for programmers of games and multimedia applications then for home users.

  3. Screw Potential! by way2trivial · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wanna know- does it have DRM?

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  4. Surround by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is it possible that most people simply don't have surround sound on their at their computers, or just listen to MP3s using MP3-players thus rendering this codec obsolete for most?

  5. Oh Joy. by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I haven't even ripped the shrinkwrap of my new sound card (top o' the line as of 5 AM, today) and it's time to look for replacements.

    But... what music is in surround? Probably that long hair stuff conducted by some symphony orchestra. Certainly not The Beatles ... unless yetanother version of remastered classics come out.

    Screw it. I'll just go downtown and listen to some live music.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  6. Realistically... the average Joe doesn't care by PornMaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Regular people" won't pay anything extra for this... they'll only use it if it's done automatically for them. Perhaps it'll get thrown in with BluRay/HD-DVD on players, and then maybe it'll get phased in, but during that kind of a format change, you're not going to get Bob McCracken going to best buy looking for a progressive scan DVD player and looking for "MP3 Surround" on the spec sheet.

    --
    500GB of disk, 5TB of transfer, $5.95/mo
  7. Re:Once again.... by evilviper · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Plus if its not backwards compatible it wont be adopted. Just accept it already.

    What evidence do you have of this? MPEG-4 sure isn't backwards compatible. AAC/WMA isn't backwards compatible, yet all of them are catching on.

    i dont think its ever going to take over the market in the near future

    Splitting infinitives is a crime punishably by a $500 fine, up to 3 days in jail, or both.
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  8. MP3 should be left alone by ChiralSoftware · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Why are they bothering with this? All the other standards that came after MP3 (AAC/Quicktime, Ogg, WMA) learned from MP3 and improved on it significantly. What's the issue with backward compatibility? Every player out there now can already play better formats.

    This is like trying to "improve" a car that's 30 years old when instead you could just have a modern car that doesn't need to be improved. Might be a fun hobby, but doesn't make sense as business idea.

  9. mp3PRO - your opinion by infofarmer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think it sounds great. It absolutely can't provide for audiophile quality, but it still does wonders on 64-128Kbit/s bitrates. Admit it, that the one and only thing that buried it - was the stupid patenting/licensing scheme. But from a technical point of view, it left OGG/AAC/WMA a step behind.

  10. Re:MP3 is dead, right? by bryan986 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Dont advertise links for your referals, slashdot is not the place for that

    --
    There is no sig