Slashdot Mirror
DaimlerChrysler/SCO Case Winds Down
kuwan writes "It was previously reported that SCO moved for and was denied a stay in their case agains DaimlerChrysler. (Remember that all of SCO's claims against DaimlerChrysler were thrown out except for the issue of whether or not DaimlerChrysler made its certification in a timely manner.) The opposition and reply memos for that motion are now available and apparently SCO's motion was so weak that DaimlerChrysler is asking SCO to pay the cost of preparing their opposition memo. A nice summary of the latest maneuvers is available at scofacts.org."
...if Slashdot fixed the links to their own stories.
A man's reach must exceed his grasp, or what's an erection for?
This is a tired old argument drummed up by people that don't like it when their comments get deleted on a website belonging to someone else and their comments violate the rules by the operator and is being perpetuated potentially by SCO shills. There's a shocker.
The sooner people realize it is HER website and she can delete comments as she sees fit even if they don't violate her terms, the sooner people can move on.
tsqr: Considering PJ's moderation policy... being considered a troll on Groklaw is more a badge of honor than an insult these days.
This is sadly and unfortunately true. I wish I had the mod points to pull your post out of flame-bait territory, where it does not belong. Hopefully some other moderator will notice it and pull it back into the thread.