Lycos Anti-Spam Screensaver Inspires Trojan
Even though it's been withdrawn, the Lycos anti-spam screensaver is not forgotten.
Rollie Hawk writes "And with this, the 'What's Good for the Goose...' award goes to all those people trying to install that notorious spam-attacking Lycos screen saver but ended up with a Trojan horse instead. This trojan is spreading via email with the subject line 'Be the first to fight spam with Lycos screen saver,' tucked in an innocent-looking file called 'Lycos screensaver to fight spam.zip.' According to F-Secure, this trojan contains keylogger elements but little more has been specified. The only question I have is how long until the 'I promise to clean that trojan disguised as a DDoSing Lycos screen saver.exe' virus gets released."
Trojan maaaan! Trojan maaaaan!
I wonder though, just how many people are going to want to fight spam using an attachemnt that arrives in a spam email?
1) Don't take candy from strangers.
2) Don't open email attachments from strangers.
-Mom and Dad
Does the "screen saver" work in Wine? I want the benefits of the trojan without the overhead of an antivirus program.
Microsoft thought it would be a really keen idea to have the messenger service enabled by default for Windows XP HOME edition. That's HOME edition. I'm fully aware of the usefulness of the messenger service in a business environment, but in a HOUSEHOLD?! WHAT THE FUCK? That doesn't make ANY sense to me at all. Nevermind all the other useless shit that's enabled by default on a standard install of XP Home, such as FTP servers and various other services that were easily exploited.
Learn something new.
>> tucked in an innocent-looking file called
>>'Lycos screensaver to fight spam.zip.'
In other news, a man in Reseda, CA, was shocked to discover that he'd been fleeced by a fraudulent business who's innocent-looking byline was:
"US Grreen CarrRd L0ttery 2005"
Seriously -- doesn't this seem like further proof that the people writing these lame-ass virii are really only interested in duping the dumbest of the dumb? I mean, they could've given it the exact same name as the real executable and caught some *vaguely* savvy people... Why not?