Slashdot Mirror


EU Presses Ahead With Galileo GPS System

philkerr writes "The BBC is reporting that European transport ministers have agreed to the 2008 deployment of the European controlled GPS system. Costing 2.1 billion euros and creating 150,000 jobs. Is this just a pork-barrel project, or something Europe really needs to break the reliance on U.S. space technology? This was discussed on Slashdot in June when the U.S. and EU reached an agreement on its deployment."

10 of 520 comments (clear)

  1. would USA rely on French, or Estonian GPS system? by fantomas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If not, why should France/ Estonia /Germany/ other EU nation rely on a US system? I can't imagine many heads of armed forces being too happy about relying on a foreign power's system that is out of their control.

  2. Yeah... by Ziviyr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It'll be nice to have a GPS system which won't be known for routine power-play dicking around.

    The US is too unstable to hold the keys to a globally relied on tech...

    --

    Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  3. Re:Competition or Redundancy? by KontinMonet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This isn't military, the system is being run by commercial companies. From the military point of view the system can be downgraded in areas of conflict. From the start, the driver for the European system was domestic use.

    The main point behind this is the increased accuracy. The US GPS is almost useless in a lot of European cities (winding, narrow streets). In London, I sometimes get 300/400m accuracy on my Garmin (which is not much good for accurate navigation) and, 25% of the time, I get an unuseable signal ("Too weak").

    And as for Europe declaring war on the US (with what, a very limited nuclear arsenal compared to the massive US stockpile?), nuclear systems use all sorts of other navigational aids besides GPS. Even 'ordinary' non-cruise missiles use other reasonably accurate methods which have been around long before GPS.

    --
    Did he inhale?
  4. oh geeze... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is this just a pork-barrel project, or something Europe really needs to break the reliance on U.S. space technology?

    If you missed everything else in the last few years, how about this one reminder: "freedom fries."

    All the other good reasons for it aside, that one act by congress made it very clear to all Europe that they're not dealing with adults.

  5. Re:would USA rely on French, or Estonian GPS syste by Goonie · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Why should that piss you off? As a citizen of the US, I absolutely DO NOT want a third party to be able to accurately aim a missile at the White House, the Capitol, or a nuclear power plant.

    You grow up. Anybody with the technology to build a missile with enough range, payload and accuracy to hit those targets effectively has the ability to make a nuclear weapon - which makes the issue of accurate targetting moot.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  6. Re:would USA rely on French, or Estonian GPS syste by Yorrike · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "As a citizen of the US, I absolutely DO NOT want a third party to be able to accurately aim a missile at the White House, the Capitol, or a nuclear power plant."

    Last time I checked, the USA did not own space. But I suppose my disagreement with the policy of the US makes me a hostile, so my opinion counts for nothing.

    Well, they would probably grumble a little, then get to work on a way to figure out a way around it, just as they have been doing for decades.

    Rubbish. The US military and government would throw a hissy fit, demanding this and that and threatening sanctions. Just like they've done when countires have threatened other US interests and resources in the past.

    --

    Looks can be deceiving. Or CAN they?

  7. Re:China by Xtian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oh, I see... its okay that the US uses its own GPS system for military purposes, and lets the countries it wants to also use it for military purposes, but if Europe decides to allow other countries to use Galileo for military purposes than the US is ofcourse right to shoot it down?

    Would the logical conclusion of this be that the EU has the right to shoot down the US GPS system if the EU felt the GPS system was being used by countries against the best interests of the EU?

  8. USA needs to stard treating Europe as equal by cabalamat2 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Why should we, the US, be forced put other nation's interests above our own?

    The USA shouldn't; and nor should Europe be forced to put the USA's interests above its own

  9. Why an agreement? by Sebastopol · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What I don't get is why the EU had to reach an agreement with the US? The EU should just use GWB's strategy and do whatever the hell it wants.

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
  10. Re:Why we need it... by Thomas+Miconi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the Spain governement has been overthrown during the last elections

    Actually the incumbent party had a comfortable lead in the polls just before the election. Then they had tha Madrid bombings. What do you think they did ? They freaked out and immediately tried to blame it on the ETA (basque terrorists), without even a shred of evidence.

    As it emerged that the bombs had been planted by Al Qaeda, the Spaniards got pretty pissed with their government and voted them out of office.

    Compare with the US, where a government which actually lied not only to his own people but to the whole damn world has been easily re-elected.

    most think that the UK government will pay in the near future too.

    If elections took place today, Labour would win hands down. You underestimate Tony Blair's strategical masterpiece: the total occupation of the political center by the Labour party, which forced opposition either to the left of the left (LibDems) or to a growingly darker shade of the right. The Conservative party is not credible any more.

    By the way, the conservative party supported the war too.

    Thomas-