Slashdot Mirror


ICANN Plans to Charge Fees to .net Domain Owners

museumpeace writes "ICANN, though it was soundly rebuffed for trying this in the past, is reported by CNET to be planning a $.75/ year fee to holders of .net domains and will look at fees for other TLD's next year. Is this taxation without representation? And where would this trend stop?"

20 of 388 comments (clear)

  1. Re:It wouldn't stop... by yourexhalekiss · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can anyone say "Boston Tea Party"?

  2. Man, that's... by StevenHenderson · · Score: 2, Funny
    www.fuckingstupid.net

    :)

  3. Great!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm going to wait at least till the third warning to pay. That way they spend more on stamps than they get from me.

  4. Re:Not that expensive by spac3manspiff · · Score: 3, Funny

    haha. Should be from the ICANN0T-afford-budget-increases dept.

  5. Re:It wouldn't stop... by tiny69 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Can anyone say "Boston Tea Party"?
    Ummm, how do you plain on doing that? Throw your .net domain registration in Boston Harbor?
    --
    Go not unto/. for advice, for you will be told both yea and nay (but have nothing to do with the question)
  6. Re:It wouldn't stop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd love to throw .NET into Boston Harbor.

  7. You know, they're doing this... by jberkom · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...just because THEYCANN.

  8. Re:Why is .net more expensive than .com? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Listen you god damned son of a bitch, when I tell you to read the fucking article, you will read the fucking article right, or else you will EAT SHIT NOW DO YOU UNDERSTAND ME GOD DAMMIT!!!

  9. Re:From the FA... by archen · · Score: 2, Funny

    Notice the trend?

    Yeah, renewing my domain name is going to be like looking at my phone bill. Tons of strange charges that make absolutely no sense.

  10. Re:Heh heh. by rcgawenda · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, as Gates said: "The internet is a pasing fad". He also promised that MSN was going to be bigger than internet, that is, internet will only be a small part into MSN, and not viceversa.

  11. Re:Why is .net more expensive than .com? by Chairboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Because a .COM is more likely to be a company, and companies have lawyers.

    A .NET, on the other hand, is more likely to be too cheap to hire lawyers, because we're more likely to be unrepentant network laying unix hippies.

  12. Finally! by Joel+from+Sydney · · Score: 5, Funny

    At last we can add in step two!

    1. Get self on ICANN board.
    2. Increase fees gradually so nobody notices. (formerly ???)
    3. Profit!

  13. As the first Thursday drunk to respond... by teamhasnoi · · Score: 4, Funny
    I say fuck that noise! Please let me know what goods and services I will be receiving from ICANN that require this money. Anything? A keychain? TCB hat? A goddamn coffee mug? Nothing.

    As a result, I will be charging ICANN a monthly 7.50 'Blow Me' fee. Bitches.

    Fees and surcharges are the first sign that you should get your gun and start thinning the herd from the top down, because someone has decided you're easy pickin' and an easy money bitch. ICANN does not DO anything, except charge poor fucks like me and you for having a shitty website.

    Now mod me offtopic, you ICANN sniffing mod-whores. HAHAHA! Profanity is always uncalled for, and used by ruffians, and ner' do-wells, so eat it.

  14. Re:It wouldn't stop... by manual_overide · · Score: 5, Funny

    OK.

    Aside from Indoor plumbing, The electric light, The telephone, The jetliner, and The internal combustion engine, what have the Romans ever done for us?

    --
    If bad puns were like deli meat, this would be the wurst
  15. Re:Content in signature by typhoonius · · Score: 2, Funny

    Thanks, I turned sigs off when the free iPod thing got going.

  16. Two Good Questions. by Maljin+Jolt · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is this taxation without representation? And where would this trend stop?

    It will never stop. Observing trends, taxation is increasing for long as past 4000 years. Next phase is Slashdot charging all Cowards $.03/year for keeping them Anonymous...

    --
    There you are, staring at me again.
  17. Re:Why is .net more expensive than .com? by eclectro · · Score: 3, Funny

    A .NET, on the other hand, is more likely to be too cheap to hire lawyers, because we're more likely to be unrepentant network laying unix hippies.

    Boy, if that's the case, those dot ORG guys must be complete neanderthals.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  18. Re:It wouldn't stop... by __aafkqj3628 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Aqueduct.

  19. Re:It wouldn't stop... by mmkkbb · · Score: 2, Funny

    boston harbor would throw it back.

    --
    -mkb
  20. Re:It wouldn't stop... by arakon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Do you have to have a permit for that?

    How many .Fish do you think you could catch with a .net?

    And being that the .fish are in the the boston harbor... are they .edible?

    --
    "If I were bound by all laws everywhere I'm sure I would have committed a capital crime somewhere."