Slashdot Mirror


Tantalizing Clues in Pictures of Saturn's Moons

Aziabel writes "Titan and Dione, two of the moons orbiting Saturn, apparently aren't exactly what researchers had previously believed. Photographs taken during a flyby of the Cassini space probe this week may clarify and even overturn long-held assumptions about the surfaces of these satellites. Bright streaks on the surface of Dione, a heavily cratered moon with little atmosphere, have long been believed to be ice, noted Carolyn Porco, imaging team leader for the Cassini project from the Space Science Institute in Boulder. Images captured this week, however, appear to indicate that the bright streaks are cliffs. They may have been created by ice, but not a lot of ice remains in the area. Meanwhile, the 'ocean' on Titan may not be. Instead of a liquid body of water, the dark mass seen on the surface of the Titan may be a viscous fluid flowing onto the white 'coastline,' Parco said. Then again, the viscous fluid could be flowing down from a higher altitude, like a glacier, onto the white mass. Right now, researchers only have two-dimensional images. Stronger conclusions may be possible with the availability later of images that are more precise, or stereoscopic images that include shadows or information on altitude."

19 of 31 comments (clear)

  1. And that is why by Striker770S · · Score: 1

    ...we do close up views of the moons for then we dont have to jump to conclusions about stuff we really dont have a good idea about. Well better start wighting out the olde astronomy books then.

    --
    I thought what I'd do was, I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes. - Catcher in the Rye
    1. Re:And that is why by name773 · · Score: 1

      nah, just leave them. it's nice to see the progress we've made since those books were produced.

  2. Re:DUPE by DaoudaW · · Score: 1

    Huh...

    One is about the rings of Saturn, the other about the satellites of Saturn. Get a clue!!

  3. Re:Rectal Catastrophe [For moderators] by DaoudaW · · Score: 1

    -1 Redundant
    -1 Illegal
    -1 Deceptive

    We've never slashdotted cnet news.com yet and are even more unlikely to under the heading science. The site is perfectly crisp.

  4. what is your problem??? by jeif1k · · Score: 3, Insightful

    $3 billion or however much it was, 6 years of waiting and now they can't figure out what the pictures are showing.

    Of course, they can't figure out what these pictures are showing. It often takes years to evaluate that kind of data fully and come to conclusions. That's to be expected when embarking on new scientific territory. We may not even get the answers we seek with Huygens either. It may take many more probes to get an idea of what Titan is like; we don't even know yet what's seeping out of the crater walls on Mars.

    With how much has been invested in this mission, I'm sure the scientists are going crazy to present the public with findings (or at least the PR people are)

    They are getting data from publicly funded instruments and they are putting it on the web as soon as they can. They are also annotating it with their first impressions and theories. That doesn't mean that they are "going crazy", it means that you are seeing science in action: raw data, hypotheses, debates, and all that. These people are doing a great job. I really don't see what your problem is with all that.

    Until then, quit confusing me.

    Just don't look, then; you'll get the Discovery channel version quickly enough.

  5. Point of order by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The summary says "liquid body of water" in description of the hypothesized ocean on Titan. Titan was always known to be too cold to have liquid H2O on the surface. The hypothesized material in the oceans was never water, it was liquid methane. CH4.

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  6. Re:Trying a little to hard by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

    And if they weren't releasing these images, we'd be accusing them of witholding data from the public. Which would you prefer?

  7. Well DUH! by Alsee · · Score: 2, Funny

    two of the moons orbiting Saturn, apparently aren't exactly what researchers had previously believed.

    That's not a moon, that's a space station!
    Errr, and the other one too!

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  8. OT:Well DUH! by linoleo · · Score: 1

    George W. Bush The Great Divider

    He can divide??

    --
    Be faithful to your obsessions. Identify them and be faithful to them, let them guide you like a sleepwalker. JG Ballard
  9. Re:Point of order #2 by linoleo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, and instead of the hypothesized liquid hydrocarbon ocean we only have a "viscous fluid", probably liquid hydrocarbons. Doh!

    --
    Be faithful to your obsessions. Identify them and be faithful to them, let them guide you like a sleepwalker. JG Ballard
  10. Which goes to show.. by adeyadey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We need more missions to the gas giants..

    Every time we look at these systems with a new generation of science instruments, there is a re-writing of the text books, and it will take years to untangle what Cassini is telling us now.

    Great though Cassini is, I think there is an argument for doing a larger number of smaller missions, using tried-and-tested technology - for example, New Horizons to Pluto is a mere $600 million, vs the $3 billion Cassini costs, and we could have a follow up New Horizons-II mission to Uranus & several KBO's for even less..

    --
    "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
    1. Re:Which goes to show.. by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      for example, New Horizons to Pluto is a mere $600 million, vs the $3 billion Cassini costs

      Cassini has far more scientific instruments. For example, it has radar. I don't think NH does. Casini is the most instrument-laden unmanned probe ever launched.

    2. Re:Which goes to show.. by adeyadey · · Score: 1

      I would guess the issue is the type of mission - NH is a fly-by, which is not sufficient time to do much with an apature radar..

      The cheap $100 mil SMART-1 mission does have a tiny radar, but it needs many polar-orbits to build up the picture..

      So I guess the cheap option to the $10 bil JIMO mission, the under $1 bil europa orbiter, could have a radar, if they wanted..

      --
      "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
  11. Cut to the chase... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    Start here, pick your resolution (up to 1800x1800 pixels on this one). Go and visit this about every week, too. You'll be glad you did. (-:

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  12. Re:Point of order #2 by ComputerInsultant · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now here is a new tactic for supporting space exploration. Announce that there are liquid hydrocarbons --- OIL --- on the surface of Titan. In no time the nations and corporations of the world will be racing to make sure that they have the rights to develop Titan's oil industry. Soon we will have regular tanker shipments from Titan.

    --
    engineers are all basically high-functioning autistics who have no idea how normal people do stuff
  13. A linear canyon on Dione by Anders+Andersson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Looking at the Dione picture, I'm intrigued by the linear feature near Dione's terminator to the left, crossing a number of craters and irregular fractures on the surface (diagonal orientation, from upper left to lower right). It has an internal shadow on the upper right side suggesting it's some kind of ditch or canyon. Given that Dione's radius is 560 km, this canyon seems to be more than 1 km wide and 100 km long. Could that be a tectonic feature too, or is it the track of a meteorite barely touching Dione's surface instead of impacting? I'm inclined to believe the latter, since it's so straight, but I wonder what such an event might have looked like.

    Maybe Cassini will obtain a closer look at this area later. It would be nice to have a 3D model of the terrain, showing elevations.

    1. Re:A linear canyon on Dione by snake_dad · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dione will get a very close pass, in october next year, don't know if that feature will be in range though. See the details on the encounters with Saturn's moons (PDF 14 kB). The Saturn tour schedule is interesting too.

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    2. Re:A linear canyon on Dione by Anders+Andersson · · Score: 1
      Dione will get a very close pass, in october next year, don't know if that feature will be in range though.

      Appearantly not, if I'm to believe the trajectory data for Cassini distributed with Celestia. That data is certainly not reliable, as Celestia predicts Cassini will collide with Dione on October 11, 2005! However, if we assume the prediction is mostly correct with respect to when Cassini will be nearest Dione, the linear canyon (which seems to be located at 10N 40E according to the maps produced from Voyager photos) will unfortunately be on the dark side at that time. When the sun rises some six hours later, Cassini will also be above the horizon, but 200,000 km away.

      The December 14 Dione flyby isn't listed among the encounters in that tour schedule, probably because 80,000 km isn't considered "close" enough. Maybe there will be yet another photo opportunity, but I doubt it. Another possibility would be for NASA to adjust the arrival time for the October 2005 encounter in case they want to get better shots of the "wispy" area, but that seems just as unlikely to me.

  14. Please use the correct terminology. Thanks. by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

    Now here is a new tactic for supporting space exploration. Announce that there are liquid hydrocarbons --- OIL --- on the surface of Titan.

    Titan? What's that? I think you mean "Halliburtia"