Slashdot Mirror


Weather Monitoring Frequencies Subject to Pollution

jd writes "In a case of technology vs. technology, the ICU (the body governing the use of radio frequencies around the globe) has been asked to secure radio frequences used for weather monitoring. In-car radar, mobile phones and other commercial and military applications are now using these same frequencies. However, weather satellites can't simply be re-tuned. There is only one very narrow band that detects water vapor but not liquid water, for example. This frequency has been sold to developers of car radar systems. The more this happens, the less useful weather radar and weather satellites will be. The noise will simply swamp the data, making what is collected useless. The article doesn't give a 'doomsday' timeframe, when we'll have no better ability to forecast the weather than they did in the 1800s, but that is what they are talking about."

1 of 139 comments (clear)

  1. Weather data weak by AlexTheBeast · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, I am not sure how great we are at predicting the weather now.

    A kid at my son's school collected and analyzied common RSS weather feeds for a science project.

    He collected the data and used it to judge how accurate the weatherman's predictions were.

    Within 5 degrees and 25% chance of rain, he gave them credit. They got credit 50ish percent of the time.

    He then analyzied other ways of predicting the weather.

    By just saying that the weather today will be the same as the weather yesterday, he got credit 50ish percent of the time.

    I don't say this to belittle the weather people. I do this to say that the techniques we use now are not the greatest in the world. If we need those frequencies because they are the only ones that work, then maybe the gov't should buy them back. However, if those frequencies are used because that's the old school way of doing it, well, they aren't working at that great now.