Music Download Service Targets Linux Desktops

An anonymous reader writes "According to DesktopLinux.com, a new music download service was launched recently by theKompany.com that, unlike iTunes and Napster, targets Linux desktops. Mindawn is claimed to provide CD-quality song files and 'virtually no' digital rights management (DRM) restrictions, offer full previews of the entire songs, and provide downloads in a variety of formats." There's also an interview with the founder.

Comments

The Good and the Bad.

[h4rm0ny]

The good stuff is all in the story - a music download service that provides Ogg format music without DRM and a Linux client.

The bad stuff is that there doesn't seem to be much support for big name music. It'll come, and it will only come through sites like this leading the way. But for now, it looks like I still have to get most of my music from iTunes.

On the plus side, things like this do help little known independent bands sell to a much larger audience. And a lot of these bands are really good. The major labels take ages to notice something good. Especially if it's original. We'll start seeing bands become successful through sites like this soon, and when they do and they keep 75% of the profits, that'll be it for the music industry as they know it.

Mighty oaks, and all that...

Re:The Good and the Bad.

[daern]

...It'll come...

Don't hold your breath. It's pretty unlikely to come because:

a) Contrary to what you hear on /. there simply aren't enough Linux desktop users out there to make developing and marketing such a service commercially viable at this time
and
b) The music industry has put *way* too much effort into DRM protected music to say "hey, let's let someone sell non-DRM music 'cos those crazy Linux guys won't share it with their mates, will they?"

Nothing personal you understand, but that's business (at least for them). I don't agree with it myself either, but that's the score today :-(

as a distributor I can tell you there are LOTS!

[linuxbaby]

We are one of the distributors of all the digital music for these companies. (iTunes, Napster, Rhapsody, etc.)

Really only the big guys are using DRM. There are lots of other smaller independent digital retailers selling music with no DRM at all. We send them the albums in FLAC, MP3, or OGG format.

Check out this list of companies that we distribute to. There's a link to each, and all of them have (or will have) the entire CD Baby Digital Distribution catalog of 30,000 albums (350,000 songs).

Seems like you can't please some people at all...

[ngunton]

I see a lot of comments along the lines of "there's not enough selection", "it'll never work as a business model", "Can't do it without the major labels", et cetera ad nauseam.

I guess I am just starting to get rather irritated with the sense of spoiled entitlement that many in the "open source" linux world seem to have these days. They expect everything to be handed to them on a silver platter, free, or else it must be crap and doomed to failure.

Whenever we hear about the latest shenanigans by the RIAA or MPAA, we hear a chorus of shrieks and wails bemoaning the fact that there are no "fair" music services out there that are unencumbered by the DRM mess.

Well, here we are: A guy actually stepped up and started something that seems to provide a very reasonable service: Songs you can download without any restrictions on subsequent use, for a very reasonable fee. And (this is what kills me) he even caters directly to Linux users. But still we hear a chorus of complaints. There isn't enough selection? He just started for crying out loud! Give him a chance to build the thing. I've often wondered myself why someone couldn't do just this sort of thing for the independent artists, just a really straightforward service that charges reasonable fees, doesn't try to screw the customer and rewards the artists. Here it is! He's trying to do it.

Here's an idea: Be grateful, try it, give him feedback, help him make it work. This is what you've been waiting for.

I don't know, sometimes I read Slashdot these days and all I see is people who want everything handed to them on a silver platter. They want everything for free, and if it isn't Open Source then it must be spawn of the devil. Unless, that is, it's Google.

I say, good luck to this guy, he's trying to do something that seems to be very worthwhile.

Just my opinion.

Checks in the mail!

[Fished]

Anonymous Coward, Your check is in the mail - thank you for supporting the Evil Empire (tm). Incidentally, in the future you should make up some more supporting details. For example, you should talk about how you've gone through 3 high-quality hard-drives to find the source of the lag, and have positively determined the problem to be in the Linux kernel. Also, you should up the specs a bit. No one is surprised any more when an 800 mhz machine is slow. However, make sure that you don't do so much specifying that someone could actually reproduce your claim. With warm regards, Santa (p.s. Nice touch in the question-begging department. Why any would chose to use linux over other "faster, cheaper, more stable systems"! We laughed out loud at that one!)

Re:Major record labels will never support this

[WindBourne]

It has never really been about music being freely traded. These attacks on p2p is purely a way to stop minor labels from growing and up and coming musicians from doing it on their own. If the cost of production approachs zero, then musicians will not need labels. As it is, the major labels are making as much money as ever before.