Slashdot Mirror
Sought for MGM v. Grokster: Non-Infringing P2P Use
linuxizer writes "Since my last Slashdot entry, I've been discussing various copyright issues with the ever-interesting Peter Fader. Out of those conversations came sniu.info, an attempt to document the various forms of substantial, non-infringing use over peer-to-peer networks before MGM v Grokster goes to the Supreme Court. So far I have about 50 entries, but more suggestions would be much appreciated.
Some fellow /. readers might also be interested in my fairly regular posts on copyright/IP issues, which are mostly links to interesting articles with occasional commentary."
100 times more often, a firearm is used to protect life. To foil crime. To defend.
P2P isn't doing much of that, either.
Bob-
The Ludwig von Mises Institute. The reasoning individuals economics
Should such a religious change to our laws (basically the "Am I not my brother's keeper?" question) should never be allowed into our laws or court system.
There is no religious implication here. Your quote is incorrect. The original quote is from Genesis 4:9 and says "Am I my brother's keeper?" and is simply a response from Cain to God when God asks where Cain's brother is. The implied answer is no though no answer is actually given and the purpose of the statement was to say that Cain did not know where his brother was and wasn't responsible for knowing.
A quick search on Google brought all this up, please stop trying to read religion into everything. This is about money, nothing else.
This sig is worse than my last.
Out of curiosity, what ARE most guns just for?
Most guns are just lying around, only to be used when the owner decides he has a valid reason to commit a crime.