Slashdot Mirror


Guy Game Results in Lawsuits and Injunction

Several readers have written in to report on Tuesday's lawsuit regarding 'The Guy Game'. The PC/console offering, which strings a weak trivia game around footage of naked college age girls, has come under fire after the revelation that a woman featured prominently in the game was under the age of 18 at the time the footage was taken. The lawsuit names Sony (PS2), Microsoft (Xbox), Take-Two Interactive (Publisher), and Top Heavy Studios (Developer) as defendants. Commentary available on GamesIndustry.biz.

4 of 111 comments (clear)

  1. Lawers are so short-sighted... by acousticiris · · Score: 4, Funny

    So sue Sony because a playstation can play a game that features content that breaks the law.

    I'm surprised they were so short-sighted:
    They should sue the maker of the digital camera used to take the picture of the girl.
    If they used a scanner and a traditional camera, they should sue both the maker of the scanner and the camera. Double the dollars!
    How about suing the DVD Consortium because they produced the scandard by which the disc used to distribute the content contained the illegal picture.

    Too much? More realistic:
    Jail all of the end-users because they now possess child-pornography.
    Sue the ESRB ... which arguably operates as a clearing-house when they choose to slap a rating on a game.

    One can argue that because MS, Sony et. al. have put controls on their console allowing them to essentially declare what can and cannot run on it (without a mod-chip of course), that they "sanctioned" rather than just simply "allowed" this to take place...
    Of course, we can expect that Sony, MS et. al. will probably be far more conservative in deciding what is or isn't allowed to operate on their systems from here on out. I may not agree with the content of the game, but it'll shame when all of the software is dumbed down so as not to offend even the most conservative among us.

    But the cynic in me has to ask the question...if this succeeds: What happens when a slick lawyer is able to confuse a judge and a jury into drawing the conclusion that the OS/product not only "is" a clearing-house, but legally "must operate as" a clearing-house for the applications running on it. Do they sue all of the Linux programmers when Linux fails to block something illegal or offensive?

    --
    "God is dead!" - Nietzsche
    "Nietzsche is dead!" - God
  2. Re:why is anyone surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    No, not unless you wank to it.

  3. I am suing by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was pictured topless in the game here:
    http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/2004/reviews/ 919657_20040901_thumb008.jpg

    (Remove stupid spacing)

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  4. Should I even ask? by Vr6dub · · Score: 2, Funny

    Anyone have a link to the screenshots?!? This reply was computer generated and no humans were involved in processing this request Of course I'm joking, kind of.....