Tech Headlines You Won't Read in 2005
prostoalex writes "Folks at Silicon.com posted a list of tech headlines that you won't see in 2005. Read about spam volume decreasing, Sun revenues soaring, Longhorn operating system delivered on time and bug-free and other news you're unlikely to see in the papers."
Whatever happen to the (past) predictions for 2004? I don't want to know what's going to happen, I want to know what will happen. Merry Xmas!
OK, 3G was overhyped few years back... but so the whole internet buzz was overestimated. During the last 5 years the so called 1G seriously evolved... now in some countries the 2-2.5G _is_ happening already. GPRS and bigger color display on mobile devices is out and it is usefull. Even commercial handheld devices with linux are available on the market... only the bandwidth is missing and that is called 3G and it is coming. Maybe not with stupid hype as the net boomed 5 years ago but smarter. :) and anyway.. it is way more realistic then a bugfree Longhorn on time :)
Guys at SCO admit that they were wrong when they claimed that Linux kernel contains the proprietory UNIX code.
Going one step further they will start advocating Linux and the advantages of Open Source.
These days, more Indian companies want to acquire companies outside India. Of course, they will be exporting people so that they can keep the costs down to minimal. This trend is not only applicable to just IT or BPO companies - but to many other sectors. These Indian companies mostly look at European countries as they think US is a bit saturated.
>> Techflock-flock onto the best bits of technology
Linux expands beyond the office into the home.
An utterly stripped version of it probably will, but without any of the four pillars remaining, it'd be like a Beatles reunion with members of Abba taking their place.
If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
When credit vendors are required to reimburse the victims.
http://www.consumer.gov/idtheft/
Oh baloney. Most every slashdot "story" is a blatant copy and paste from the first paragraph of an actual publication, and what meagre original content may be present in the writeup is penned by someone with no concept of proper grammar or spelling, often in broken, incomplete sentences. The Pulitzer committee would be laughed off the face of the earth for rewarding this kind of "journalism" with any sort of reward.