Slashdot Mirror


Cassini's Robot Lab Successfully Separates

toomanyairmiles writes "The BBC has an article indicating NASA's Cassini probe has successfully launched its robot lab on its three-week journey into the atmosphere of Saturn's moon Titan. 'Such is the chemistry and temperature (-180C) on Titan that scientists suspect it may harbour lakes, even great seas, of methane or ethane.' Seemingly we have very little idea of what we'll find there: 'Even Cassini's remarkable instruments have struggled to get at the facts. Scientists can see dark and bright regions on the surface, but quite what they represent no one is really sure.'"

17 of 94 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Huygens by spiny · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www-gap.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Mathemati cians/Huygens.html

    --

    Fry: heh, Yakov Smirnoff said it
    Leela: No he didn't.
  2. I Wanna See Rain! by Haydn+Fenton · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I can remember the BBC program about Titan, or some TV show about it anyway. It was pretty fascinating stuff really, especially how rain on Titan will appear. Because the atmosphere is more methane/ethane, when the rain falls, it will be like normal rain at first because higher up in the air it will be colder and the methane/ethane will be liquid, but as it gets closer to the surface, it will turn into a gas as it warms up, so the rain will turn from liquid into a gas before it reaches the surface, and will then rise upwards. Hellish cool if you ask me. Especially if its green, I think it was on the TV show, although clearly thats just a mock up. And seas of methane and ethane will also be cool, if theyre green.. probably wont be, but hey.
    Bring on the rain!

    1. Re:I Wanna See Rain! by NoseBag · · Score: 5, Informative



      In Arizona, its called Virga i.e. rain that never reaches the ground.

      Its actually quite neat to see in the distance. You can see the downpour falling, usually from under a nice dark thundercloud (uh, where else?), and then it kinda gets fuzzy and vague, and then it just....isn't. The "isn't" boundary also moves up and down slowly - due to air currents and such, I guess. Its quite peaceful to observe.

      --
      Cloned foods give the statement "We had that last week!" a whole new meaning.
    2. Re:I Wanna See Rain! by isolationism · · Score: 3, Interesting
      As I understand it, the ethane/methane "rain" will also be the size of golf balls because of the low gravity. This is only, I confess, according to Stephen Baxter's Titan which I just finished reading.

      Anyone looking for a good, very hard sci-fi read on the subject of Titan, the book is a great one. It has the added bonus of picking up more or less exactly right now, timeline-wise. It also has some rather frighteningly accurate forecasts with relation to the ... ah, U.S. political sentiment of the time. It was published in 1997.

  3. Hooray for NASA/ESA collaboration by ikewillis · · Score: 5, Informative
    For those who don't know, the Hyugens probe bound for Titan was developed by the EU's Space Agency. It will provide us with the first glimpses below Titan's cloudy surface, and was carried by NASA's Cassini probe.

    It's wonderful to see such collaboration between the ESA and NASA, and I hope we continue to see such efforts in the future.

    1. Re:Hooray for NASA/ESA collaboration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      While we're educating - the EU does not have a space agency. The European Space Agency is it's own (or it's member nations...), and not a part of the EU. A few countries who are not in the EU are in ESA (hell, even Canada is - though they're a little special :). I still find the collaboration wonderful though - the world would be a better place with some more of that...

  4. Ever see 2010? by Faust7 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Scientists can see dark and bright regions on the surface, but quite what they represent no one is really sure.

    My money's on the dark regions being a plague of multiplying monoliths. Cover your eyes...

  5. Image of the Huygens/Cassini separation by ikewillis · · Score: 4, Informative
    Here's an excellent image of the seperation of the Cassini spacecraft with the Huygens probe bound for Titan:

    http://planetary.org/saturn/images_spacecraft.html

    1. Re:Image of the Huygens/Cassini separation by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Excellent artist's interpretation of what the seperation might look like

  6. An open door. by OgTheBarbarian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Now just imagine, however inhospitable the conditions sound to us, if that probe came back with images of a civilization or even an outpost (inhabited or abandoned/destroyed). That one piece of news would turn the whole world on its edge. Sometimes great discoveries come, when you're not really looking for them. 'If it is just us, it seems like an awful waste of space.' - Contact

  7. Demonic discovery? by Xentropy · · Score: 4, Funny

    I find the random insertion by /. of a large Doom 3 ad (consisting of a closeup of a demonic figure) right after the text of this article an amusing irony. Just what DO we expect to find down there?

  8. NASA have picutres up of the seperation by Bhalash · · Score: 4, Interesting
  9. It's called HUYGENS!! by SeaDour · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Robot Lab"? WTF?!? Give some credit where it's due!

  10. opinions by morcheeba · · Score: 4, Funny

    Even Cassini's remarkable instruments have struggled to get at the facts.

    From what I heard, the instruments were just giving their opinions, ruminations, and vague rumors. One even broke into song, which, from a scientific viewpoint, yielded very little hard data...

  11. Not enough time on the surface by PingXao · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I know there must be a zillion reasons why they designed the Huygens probe mission the way they did, but to me it seems like a pity that it's only got enough battery life to operate for 30 minutes on the surface after it lands, assuming it doesn't sink in a hydrocarbon lake. It took 7 years to get there for only 30 minutes worth of surface obserations? The results it sends back from only 30 minutes worth of surface exploration will surely raise more questions than they answer, and since this is the last of the big-ticket planetary probes we're likely to see for decades to come it just doens't seem like a long enough window to operate. Weight probably had a lot to do with the decisions made. Batteries are heavy. That plus the uncertainty as to whether it will land on solid ground at all most likely drove the 30-minute mission requirement, but it still seems too short. I must be getting spoiled by the Mars rovers.

    1. Re:Not enough time on the surface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      It will have been doing major science for over two hours by the time it lands, including taking pictures all the way down. Whatever it does on the surface is 'bonus' time. And no, if it splashes down in a lake, it will not sink. In fact, it has an instrument that will use sonar to try and determine the depth of the lake. Also, whatever it does on the surface is constrained not just by battery life, but by communications with Cassini -- which will vanish over Titan's horizon about an hour after the probe lands.

  12. fortunately, doppler has been sidestepped. by bmfs · · Score: 4, Informative

    Remain silent? There was a BBC Horizon documentary on this very subject broadcast earlier this year. You can read more about the problem and the solution here:

    http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/WEBONLY/publicfeature /oct04/1004titan.html

    And here:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/tvradio/programmes/horizon /saturn_prog_summary.shtml

    Problem: Italian Company (Alenia Spazio) responsible for comms corrected for doppler shift on the carrier signal, but not on the data rate. Alenia Spazio's insistence on confidentiality may have played a role in this oversight. NASA reviewers were never given the specs of the receiver. As JPL's [Robert] Mitchell explained, "Alenia Spazio considered JPL to be a competitor and treated the radio design as proprietary data."

    Solution: Altered the trajectory of Cassini / Huygens so that Huygens is moving parallel to Cassini during descent, sidestepping the doppler shift issue.