Slashdot Mirror


GIMP Interface Proposals?

Anonymous Coward asks: "It would seem that naught but its developers themselves like the GIMP's UI. How would you like the GIMP to look? Reply with links to GIMPed (or Photoshopped, if you swing that way) screenshots. Individual features, the menu structure, or (preferably) default workspaces after you open up a blank new canvas." With the release of version 2.2 in the bag, 2.3 development should now be in full swing. What aspects of the interface do you think the GIMP team should make for the next release and for future relases down the line?

3 of 218 comments (clear)

  1. This kinda reminds me of Blender by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The UI is non-intuitive, but once people use it they swear that it is better than every other 3d program available. Either Blender has the best UI in the world or it's just a tendancy of human beings to rationalise their decisions after they have invested in them significantly. Either way, Blender's complex non-intuitive UI has done a lot to build the Blender community. I believe the same is true of GIMP but to a slightly lesser extent. Why change anything?

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  2. I've got a little list! by leonbrooks · · Score: 4, Interesting
    • Add the Free/FixedAspect/FixedSize options from the Rectangular Select tool into the Crop tool.
    • Add a "macro recorder" to make writing Script-Fu easier
    • Add a simple "debug mode" to trace Script-Fu execution and/or hand off to the Script-Fu Console from the invokation dialog box
    • Add a de-red-eye tool that's a bit more intelligent, specifically
      • that identifies round or ovoid red-eyes rather than anything red
      • that uses soft edges rather than doing scalpel-like total excision
    • build a Script-Fu to do this either straight from the camera or with all of the layers in a designated image.
    There's lots more, that's just what's on the tip of my mind right now.
    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  3. I know it's not directly GIMP-related by PinkX · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But a native port of GTK+ to OS X (via quartz/Aqua and not using X11) would be of great benefit.

    I've been a GIMP user since its early days. I was a former Photoshop aficionado, and by far I think the GIMP's UI is easier to use and more intuitive of that of PS. The right-click menu just rocks, the floating and dockable toolbars and panels are really practical.

    Almost 1 year ago I moved from Linux to OS X on the desktop. GIMP is still my favorite image manipulation software, but I would *really really* love to see it more integrated with the OS, as X11 is slow, bloated and unstable and just doesn't looks natural.

    I know the GIMP developer aren't to blame for this, but a native port of GTK+ and its related tools to the OS X framework would be great, to eliminate the dependency on X11 and get a more 'at home' feeling with the app. It was already done for Windows and OS X *should* be easier AFAIK because all the underlying *NIX stuff is already there.