Slashdot Mirror
Animal Cloning Comes to Hollywood
Kate Thompson writes "A week after San Francisco's Genetic Savings and Clone revealed the sale of their first cat to a customer, the Boston Phoenix reports that GS & C acknowledges it has been hired by anonymous buyers in Hollywood to bank genes of show business animals."
They're already cloning all their scripts.
Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
They gonna clone Brad Pitt now?
Free Firefox news reader.
That is, if they ever decide to make one. For the first two, they had to use a LOT of pigs, because they only look that cute for the first week or so of their lives.
Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
Africus aut Europaeus?
I think that some of these animals are pretty 'talented' and it maybe hard to find an animal (like a movie bear or something) which has the potential to learn well and has the right 'personality'. Cloning the ones that just died ensures you that at least the animal is capable of learning the stuff you want to teach it.
I am not bothered about the whole cloning issue, I think it is an inevitable thing, also with humans.
Just because the cloned animal has exactly the same genes, doesn't mean that it will exhibit the same behaviour.
The dog that played Benji might have had an ideal temperament for filming, but it's clone, brought up slightly differently might be a right little ankle biter.
Brocklesby Park Cricket Club
LASSIE 2.0
And now you can take your very own Lassie home after the movie! You send us the cash, we send you your very own Lassie in a box. Overnight delivery, we swear! The dog has food and water in the box, we assure you...
You can clone the animal, but not the intensive training required for participation in show business.
Do you like German cars?
So that they can keep the cute dog in the TV show sitcom alive for all 30 seasons.
What I can't wait for is when Fluffy Clone #2726A flips out and eats the cute wisecracking kid.
Bet they can't clone him....
I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
Does this say something for originality, and the fear of showbusiness people that their talent and success is all wrapped up on the abilities of one cat, dog, pig, britney, whatever?
In other news today: Warner Bros announces "Free Willy Again."
The other problem is that, as we found with "Dolly the Sheep", cloned animals are inherently pretty unhealthy, because their cells age a lot faster (lies to children explanation). At two years old, Dolly had a lot of problems that would really only crop up in a much older animal, presumably because the cell's genetic "clock" was not "reset" (LTC again).
Still, nice work if you can get it. Who's going to tell the difference, even if the animals are *not* cloned?
By the time this cloning technology gets off the ground, it will be easier/cheaper to replicate the animal with CGI.
PimpMyMazda.com - Crazy mods to a 2002 Mazda Protege DX.
Or keep 10 clones on hand for the "Throw the cat in the blender" scene. Then when animal rights people come over to check you can show them the real cat and they will never know the difference.
While selling back a physical looking animal will bring in a fair chunk of change, and really how big can that market be. How much work would they have to do to make a benji next year, the main thing would be the breed and same hair color and pattern ; thoses can be changed by dye and makeup.
Where the big money will be is selling clones to the public. When a popular show/movie has a animal the sales of that animal almost aways increases. For example when the comedy Fraiser was on the air the Jack Russell terrier rose in popularity in the each year(in 2000 along by 21%). Now instead of purchasing any Jack Russell terrier you can purchase a clone of the actual one on the show. How much do you think people would pay for that?
Granted costs will have to come down ALOT, but if you are thinking for the future this is the way to go.
Now, if Peter Jackson had been able to clone 100,000 copies of my wife he'd have had his Orc army without needing special effects.
Genetic Savings & Clone are currently cloning cats for $50 000 - that's pretty cheap already compared to getting an effects house to create a photorealistic character. Sure, I havn't factored in the cost up bringing up the animal, but CGI is still comparatively expensive, and the results aren't always that believable - the best CGI effects work is typically on fictional characters (Gollum), where movements are a combination of motion capture and keyframing. You'd still need an animal to base movements on - I can't recall a recent film which had a believable CGI animal (that's a "realistic" animal, rather than a talking / exagerrated character). On a more practical front, I'm sure actors would actually prefer working with an animal (trouble that they may be), so they can realistically react to them - you just don't really get that with a CGI character (unless you get an actor to perform with the cast, and composite over. This may work for human like characters, but completely defeat the point for animals, because you'd still need one in the scene).
Scientifically, this could make for some interesting "nature vs. nurture" experiments.
Well, someone had to say it. But seriously...
I'm all for folks getting in on the cloning business. At the worst, it can't be more unethical than what many pet farms already are.
This provides a financial incentive to refine the technology and make the whole thing more acceptable and familiar to people. Animal breeding has fewer ethical restrictions than medical cloning, so there are fewer ethical roadblocks.
___
It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
Why wait till your favourite animal asset dies before reinvesting? Just make another one, train em up and get two going at once!! Two Flippers filming at once! too easy. at 50 grand its only a matter of time (probably about 3 months)
Combining Cujo with Pet Sematary.
1) Make clones of Jenna Jameson.
2) Remove the "dirty slut" gene, replacing it with a modified version of the "obedient wife" gene (which morphs back into the "dirty slut" gene when she's in the sack with her husband). It might not hurt to genetically enhance her breasts while your at it so she won't have to pay for them later.
3) Sell clones as mail order brides.
4) Profit!
1) Make the movie ...
2) Clone for real a cat
3) Clone Schwartzenegger
4) Make Washington to approve the "6th day law"
5) In press release, say "see? even sci-fi movies we produce becomes real"
6)
7) Profit!
8) "The day after tomorrow" becomes real
Since people started playing with DNA, it's obvious that people could start cloning things that belong to somebody else.
Can you claim copyright on your pet?
We've heard plenty about Intellectual Property (IP), but what about Physical Property (PP)?
What if somebody cloned you? What legal issues could arise from this?
Linux/Open Source/Anti Microsoft News
I recently saw a TV-program about cloning pets. Cloned cats doesn't get the same pattern on the fur as the original. Some of the clones doesn't even get close to the same colour on the fur. In showbiz, shouldn't that make the clone useless?
Apple built a platform for their ideas, Google built one for everyone's.
I'm too lazy to look it up, but there was at least one case of a subject in a research study sueing the researcher for a share of the profits of a genetically engineered treatment/product that was developed from his tissue samples.
I don't remember what the outcome was, but I suspect that nothing was clarified.
Theory and practice are the same in theory, but different in practice.
Another Fiddler on Another Roof
The Day After the Day After Tomorrow
Revenge of the Godfather
The Matrix: Reloaded; Revisited
The Thing, Yet Again
They should be spending their money on promoting the idea of saving sheltered and stray animals. We don't need more puppy mills. We need to save the ones that are going to get killed tomorrow because they shopped at the puppy mill today. Pure breeds with papers should be down played while saving the sheltered should be turned into a status symbol. Hollywood could fuel this change if they wern't such pompus assholes.
I have an idea, Lets clone Britney so we can put Madonna "down".
The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
I doubt it... since YOU as a person did not create your pet (I seriously hope you did not genetically splice your pet), you merely own it, you cannot claim intellectual property rights. However, you may sue if they took samples of your pet without consent and develope something out of it. Not sure what the penalty is thou.
However, if someone clone you without your consent, then you can sue. I remember there's a law somewhere about tissue sample collection. It basically state that for someone to acquire your tissue, they must have your consent and inform you of the purpose of the collection before the collection takes place. However, the above does not apply if you "discard" your tissue (like a gauzz to cover a bleeding wound). Then I'm not sure if there's a law to cover that at all. However, in a jury trial I will seriously doubt that anyone will let this sort of thing happen even if there's no basis in law.
In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.