Slashdot Mirror


Inside the Shadow Internet

Paladin144 writes "Wired has a report about the mysterious 'pirate networks' that obtain new movies, music & games before they are released and spread them throughout the net. It's not as simple as putting a movie on LimeWire. These people are highly organized and very paranoid about secrecy. They maintain a hidden network of top-level FTP sites that get the best files first and allow them to trickle down the pyramid and into many a slashdotter's sweaty little fingers."

34 of 954 comments (clear)

  1. Well.. by lightdarkness · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well... I used to be apart of one of the pyramids, before I got caught.

    I used to have access to the Distro section of an elite IRC channel, known across the net.

    They would give movies to those few, who would then take them to the regular channel.

    It's really crazy, and insanly hard to get in to, but you would get stuff very early.

    Also, easier to get caught, as I found out.

    1. Re:Well.. by lightdarkness · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Supprising, they punishment wasn't bad.

      They shut off our internet, until they could get a letter to us, and we had to sign it, saying we wouldn't do it again.

    2. Re:Well.. by JohnsonWax · · Score: 5, Funny

      So, have you done it again?

      Yours truly,
      Undercover FBI Dude

    3. Re:Well.. by gad_zuki! · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What's the motivation? Is is just self-importance?

      Reading this article kinda made me feel sick, as if all these people were so addicted to all these horrible hollywood releases (Hellboy?!) and RIAA crap, they were compelled to share it like tape traders of old.

      Seems like a huge waste of time and talent to bust your butt and possibly face jail time for the new Good Charlotte or Linkin Park.

      I'm hoping the scene does this "because its there and it can be done" for this 99% or so terrible content. But the piece on the people making a "Netflicks content" server implies otherwise.

    4. Re:Well.. by lightdarkness · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I didn't watch 75% of the videos I downloaded

      The motivation was the statistics. Seeing that I shared 10 gigs of movies in a day kinda made me feel important. I was almost op'd in one of the channels due to how much I was doing.

      I just did a little search, and found out the site I used to do this for is still going. Very supprised at how they keep at it, when I was caught so easily.

    5. Re:Well.. by dirkdidit · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The Movie Depot! Man they kicked ass. Had the good movies weeks before release.

      I remember them well. I wasn't at the very top of their pyramid, but I wasn't at the bottom, either. I was lucky enough to have a DSL connection back then (late '98-early '99) with a nice upload speed, so I was able to become one of the distribution FTPs. Once you established your "legitness", you'd easily be able to get movies 2 weeks or more, sometimes a month even, before they actually came out in theaters. I remember I had "The Matrix" three weeks before it ever came out. I thought I was cool shit, then again I was doing this as a rather naive 12 year old.

      As for what got me out the scene. A bunch of people that I regularly traded with were getting nailed, so I bailed. They were good times while they lasted, though. Haven't used a FTP for anything but legimate traffic since.

    6. Re:Well.. by dstech · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That's because you were what is called a "mule" in the world of drug dealing. A mule is the low-end pusher/dealer, the person that deals with individual users, and always the fall guy. Not that I'm saying file sharing and drug dealing are analogous...

      In the warez community, as I understand it, you were probably either an "IRC/P2P Kiddie" or a "Racer" (if you got into sitetrading). Both of these are fairly easy to spot (from the perspective of syndicates like the RIAA & MPAA and the feds) because you are moving a lot of copyrighted data in plain text, with unobscured filenames. Until the very recent past, these "middlemen" were seen as fairly harmless by the FBI & co.

      Before the MPAA/RIAA campaigns against end users came into play, you would have been given a slap on the wrist (which, it would seem, is what happened). If you were doing the same stuff today, your personal information might have undergone the subpeona process the RIAA & MPAA have become infamous for, and you might have faced a civil suit and/or criminal charges. Consider yourself lucky to have gotten caught back then!

      (Most of my information comes from the article "A Guide to Internet Piracy" in 2600 Magazine, issue 21:2. It looks to be the same information, pretty much, as the Wired article mentioned in the top post, although I admit I have not RTFA. This is slashdot, after all...)

    7. Re:Well.. by paganizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Did anyone read the article?
      Think about how they are slanting things; the article gives the impression that the vast majority of new material is being initially provided by these shadow networks.
      Back in the day when I was dodging sundevils (a cookie if you get the reference), that was essentially true.
      In the current picture, it's a vast overstatement; yes, there are "elite top level" groups, but they are mainly kiddies; the majority of app and game files circulating on the 'net are either done by 1 person who figured out the crack from standard deprotection tools, or from the established cracking houses like paradox, class, etc.
      The wording and, um, flavor? of the article is to create a scary thing on the internet that even the relatively well informed have heard of remotely or even been a peripheral member of, much the same way the Bush administration manufactured links between 911 and Iraq, and for essentially the same reason.
      It IS obvious right? if you stop and think about it? This is just a step down the path of making us accept fewer online freedoms, as a necessary aspect of the war on cyber-terrorism.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
  2. The Rules by da3dAlus · · Score: 5, Funny

    The first rule of the shadow internet is, you do not talk about the shadow internet.
    The second rule of the shadow internet is, you DO NOT talk about the shadow internet. ...

    --

    Sometimes I doubt your commitment to Sparkle Motion.
    1. Re:The Rules by ceejayoz · · Score: 5, Funny

      The third rule of the shadow internet is, if you talk about the shadow internet, a 14 year old pimply faced nerd threatens you with a supposed 350 pound hitman with a glock.

  3. yes, ther is nothing like by geekoid · · Score: 5, Funny

    spending hours and hours developing contacts so you can get a copy of a movie filmed from inside a theater.

    yeah, that'll hurt the industry.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  4. Excellent overview of the pirate network by IO+ERROR · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The pirate release networks have been operating like this ever since people figured out how to connect two computers together. There has always been one or more topsites for any pirate group, and you can only get in by invitation.

    Back in the day, these sites were run on BBSs whose phone numbers were non-published and which only a few people had access to. These days it's FTP sites, but the principle is the same. And frequently it's not their own FTP sites, but someone else's site which isn't properly secured, but this happens more at the lower levels.

    Anyway, the networks run the same as they always have. You're either in or you're out. And most people are out.

    --
    How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    1. Re:Excellent overview of the pirate network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
  5. Thank goodness for these people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Without the threat of piracy, its a good bet that CD's and DVD prices would be 50-100% higher than they are today.

    If economics and history teach us anything, its that producers of any product, whether its widgets or music, or movies, will raise the price as high as they can in the absence of any competition.

    Since Government sponsered "Intellectual Property" is a defacto monopoly supported by the government, the only relief we have is to just grab the stuff if they charge too much.

    1. Re:Thank goodness for these people by pediddle · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Haven't they? Premier DVDs are on sale now for $9.95, whereas just a year or two ago nothing was available for less than $20-25. IMO, publishers have realized that crappy Hollywood blockbusters that lots of people want to buy but nobody wants to pay for are prime targets for piracy. God knows I wouldn't pay $20 for a copy of Hellboy that I'd watch exactly once, but I'd more than likely download one. But I might pay $9.95 for one, especially if that's less than I would have paid in a theater the first time around.

    2. Re:Thank goodness for these people by anon*127.0.0.1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or you could just not buy the product. I realize in that case you'd have to actually make a sacrifice and deprive yourself of something, but at least you'd have a clean conscience.

      The people who produce music and movies and whatever do have competition. They're all in the "entertainment industry". Most people have a certain portion of their income which the allot to entertainment. If people feel that one form of entertainment is too expensive, they'll start spending their money elsewhere. Movies, concerts, sporting events, travel, hobbies.... entertainment is a wide field. If the pirate networks were shut down tomorrow, we wouldn't see CD prices move a dime. There's still too much competition for the entertainment dollar.

      I'm not saying I never grabbed an MP3 or copied a floppy, but I never tried to justify it with some half-assed argument about fighting an evil tyrannical government conspiracy. I just stole it because I didn't want to pay for it.

      --
      I am NOT a man!
      I am a free number!
  6. Valve is not your friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    " so many problems for our friends at Valve"

    Valve is a business. They're not your pal, they're not your relative, they're not the cool people next door.

    They're a business that is out to make money. Never forget that about any company. Even Apple.

    1. Re:Valve is not your friend by number11 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      God forbid a business should make money.

      That's ok. They're in business to make money. By the same token, they don't deserve your loyalty or respect unless they've paid you for it.

      My loyalty and respect aren't for sale.

    2. Re:Valve is not your friend by incom · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Funny, I didn't see anything in the post saying that it was a bad thing to conduct a profitable business, or anything even close. It seemed like it was pointing out the irationality of harboring friendly emotions towards such an entity, with your relationship being merely a consumer.

      --
      True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
  7. Umm, 'scuse me mr. reporter, its "VPN" .. by torpor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    .. not 'shadow internet'.

    Virtual Private Network.

    The oh-so subtle difference between positions (shadow internet vs. VPN) is that if someone does a google for VPN, they'll realize just how damn easy it is.

    "Shadow Internet"-way just sounds comic-book super-hero, and as we all know thats as literary as most peoples thoughts go, it won't be obvious that 'any joe can build their own private and secret Internet on top of the Internet'.

    (Not just 'elite techno-psycho-fascist' types hell-bent on destroying 'systems'. *Anyone*.)

    Obscure, eh?

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  8. Re:I thought it was generally known by Sheetrock · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I've read that mega-pirates don't even enjoy the majority of what they crack and distribute. It's all about the process for them -- some like to defeat copy protection, most like the social circles and ego they've got from being first to release or having the best stuff to offer.

    Menace to society, indeed. Maybe they'd do better to pick up programming and write free software rather than cracking someone else's, but I think you've hit the nail on the head; it's not even about the software or movies or music being pirated, in my opinion, when one gets in to the degree these folks have. They get nothing out of what they do but they get nailed harder than spammers or spyware purveyors.

    --

    Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
    -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




  9. Pissed off people by mellon101 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This article, and whoever it was they interviewed... really has some of these guys pissed off. http://www.vcdquality.com/index.php?page=nfo&id=46 020

  10. A few forgotten roles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The article didn't mention The Brains - the crackers who break the copy protections for games/apps or The Carders - people who use stolen credit cards to purchase a valid serial # for games/apps. Insiders are pretty rare.

    And what's with the glorification? It's pretty boring stuff, expect when two groups release the same thing just a few minutes apart. You mainly sit in front of IRC all day long. In the Western countries it may be about bragging rights and prestige. In Asia, these releases are big business for a lot of computer stores. You feed your ego, they feed their family. What a waste of time.

  11. Busted! by dj245 · · Score: 5, Funny
    In April, federal agents interrogated Frank and impounded all his computer equipment. So far, no charges have been filed. "But the Feds had no idea about Half-Life," he boasts. "I was never connected to that shit. If they found out, I'd be in jail."

    So the pirate the feds arrested, interrogated, and impounded in April, but didn't file charges yet against, is the Half-life guy. That narrows it down quite a bit.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  12. this is old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    we read this the week before it was published.

  13. Re:Let me guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Heh heh. I'm 33 and let me tell you a 'when-I-was-your-age' story... When I was your age, you weren't even born yet, me and some friends had two C64s and two Amiga 1000s set up in an apartment. Back then, you called long distance to the BBS of interest. We used all the phreaker tricks to get free phone calls. The phone company knows when you do this and when you exceed a certain amount of time, they come to get you. And they did. Heh heh. I wasn't there when it happened, I was the hardware guy. But anyways those were the days.

  14. Secret? by age+of+reason · · Score: 5, Funny

    "These people are highly organized and very paranoid about secrecy."


    That`s why they made Wired.

  15. Re:Curious tone by Sheepdot · · Score: 5, Informative

    The individuals this article recognizes are more commmonly known as FXPer's. These are often legitimate and illegitimate FTP server operators.

    Ago, who reportedly (see http://www.livejournal.com/users/gravito/2197.html for explanation) stole the HL2 code, was a botnet coder. While botnets are designed primarily for three purposes: DDoSing, File Trading, and Spamming, they are not used for stealing source code. Instead, this is someone that acted of their own will to use a botnet to hide their identity when stealing the source. The source was also propagated via this method.

    The FXPer's are actually an echelon higher than botnet herders. The FXPer's have nothing to do with stealing Half-Life 2's source code. They are, indeed, the closest thing we have to romantic pirates. They also purchase the majority of the software they crack and distribute, ironically. They do this as a philosophical movement, and do not believe in copyright law or IP law.

    A good deal of the FXPer's also contribute to open source and are active on Slashdot.

  16. Re:Wannabes by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 5, Funny
    I don't get that. Wouldn't it be better if they sent an average looking hitman, so he would be less conspicuous? I mean, why does he have to be heavy or strong when has a gun? So he could kill the journalist "even better" or what? Doesn't make any sense.

    Hell, if I ever wanted to take out a hit on someone, I'd hire a midget with a knife. Nobody would expect that. Even if the victim gets warned, nobody would take it seriously. "Dude, look out for a midget with a knife!" "Riiiight."

    --
    Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
  17. Re:In the day by poopdeville · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A "friend" of mine spent some time doing mp3 trading through several forums for a few years before Napster came out. Basically, he joined a niche channel on EFnet and got to know the regulars. I talked with them too -- they were really nice actually. Within a few months, he was a channel operator, was constantly invited to the "big" channels, and had access to a terabyte of mp3's (in 1997!) through various ftp servers. It's kind of like buying drugs -- you have to know when you've met the right people. Being really funny helps, too.

    --
    After all, I am strangely colored.
  18. The Shadow Internet by dr_dank · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Shadow Internet is just like the real internet, except we all have goatees.

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  19. HL2: "almost a year of reprogramming" by Admiral+Burrito · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Did anyone else's bullshit detector get pegged by this?...

    Within minutes of appearing on Anathema, Half-Life 2 spread. One file became 30 files became 3,000 files became 300,000 files as Valve stood helplessly by watching its big Christmas blockbuster turn into a lump of coal. The damage was irreversible - the horse was out of the barn, the county, and the state. The original Half-Life has sold more than 10 million games and expansion packs since its late 1998 release. Half-Life 2's official release finally happened in November, after almost a year of reprogramming.

    ...Specificly, the "almost a year of reprogramming" part.

    It seems that when people hear that the HL2 code was "stolen", they interpret that in the literal sense. It was "taken" from Valve so they had to "reprogram" it because they didn't have it anymore. This bogon seems to appear even among people who should know better (like Wired reporters).

    I guess Orwell was right: Control language, control thought.

    Imagine how productive OSS developers would be if they didn't "give away" all of their source code with every new version.

  20. "Pirate," eh? by JeffTL · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As Stallman (Free Software, Free Society; pp. 190-191) said, calling it piracy implies that unauthorized copying is tantamount to armed robbery, kidnap, and murder on the high seas. They both involve theft of a sort -- but are vastly different. Copyright infringement generally involves cheating someone out of their rightful royalties; piracy involves depriving sailors and their employers of life, liberty, or property (maybe all three!) without due process of law. I'd say that copyright infringement is not morally tantamount to this.

  21. Quote of the Article ... by onosendai · · Score: 5, Interesting
    has to be ...
    Last summer Jun Group dropped a collection of live videos and MP3s from Steve Winwood on the topsites. "We got 2.9 million downloads," says Forest, "and album sales took off."
    ..Small sample set maybe, but hopefully soon, 'they' will understand that #downloads ~= #sales
    --
    <? include ('signature.inc'); ?>