Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Comparing Codecs for 2004

Posted by michael on from the CGA-is-all-anyone-should-ever-need dept.

MunchMunch writes "Popular encoding/guide/news site doom9.org has just put up its codec shoot-out for 2004, comparing 3ivx 5.0, Divx Fusion 5.9 (prerelease 6.0), Nero Digital Main Profile and High Profile, RealVideo 10, On2 VP6, VideoSoft's VSS, Xvid 1.0, MS's WMV9 and, last, newcomer Jomingo's HDX4. The comparison covers the speed, accuracy, target-file-size-adherence and other aspects of the codecs -- but also lets you compare yourself via high- and low-bandwidth framegrabs of each codec with a nice zoomable image-swap script."

3 of 233 comments (clear)

  1. Re:No OGM? by galaxy300 · · Score: 0, Troll

    STFU.

    --
    seriouslyexcited.net
  2. Free as in ... by Duncan3 · · Score: 0, Troll

    So which ones on the list are free as in no patents (implys beer and code)... AND ... playback on Windows, OS X and Linux.

    Any of them yet? I didn't add the ultra critical "plays on mom's 50$ DVD player" because I'm sure none of them will do that.

    There is no point at all encoding anything unless the above are all true.

    --
    - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
  3. Re:Why XviD (unfortunately) fails.. by xgamer04 · · Score: 0, Troll

    So code a version that works with it, troll.

    --
    When you look at the state of the world, how can you not become a radical, liberal anarchist?